Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add section for environmental criteria #59

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mprorock
Copy link

@mprorock mprorock commented Sep 21, 2021

Need a section in order to add explicit criteria that address environmental questions

@jandrieu let me know if this is the right way to do this now as I think we need to root section in first optimally before adding additional criteria per the new guidelines in #49


Preview | Diff

index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@OR13
Copy link

OR13 commented Nov 4, 2021

This PR should be accepted, and the editors of the rubric should preserve and reflect the desires of WG members in this matter.

@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Dec 7, 2021

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2021-12-07

  • no resolutions were taken
View the transcript

2. DID Rubric PR 59.

Daniel Burnett: next item on the agenda, did rubric #59.

See github pull request did-rubric#59.

Daniel Burnett: be aware, we are going to start tackling rubric PRs next....

@jandrieu
Copy link
Contributor

This section needs at least one criteria to be acceptable.

@rxgrant Have you made any progress on #52?

@rxgrant
Copy link
Contributor

rxgrant commented Dec 14, 2021

@rxgrant Have you made any progress on #52?

I have some private notes that I've started, some with criteria as they apply to existing DID Methods. I'll pull out an outline today so that the section has a place for others to add thir work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants