Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

beta/v0.3.18.2+aeb update #1528

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

danielsanchezaran
Copy link

@danielsanchezaran danielsanchezaran commented Sep 10, 2024

Description

This PR updates the AEB module to be closer to current autoware's AEB and adds polling subscribers (AEB depends on them) to let the AEB module subscribe to its target topics.

Requires updates to launch: https://github.com/tier4/autoware_launch.x1.eve/pull/487

Related links

Parent Issue:

  • Link

How was this PR tested?

Notes for reviewers

None.

Interface changes

None.

Effects on system behavior

None.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>
…autowarefoundation#8569)

* make it so AEB works with only one req path type (imu or MPC)

Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>

* fix missing mpc path return

Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>

* add check

Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>

* modify no path msg

Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>
…arefoundation#8611)

fix bug by using the collision data keeper

Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 10, 2024

Copy link

@sfukuta sfukuta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please respond to review comments.


- Ego vehicle is not in autonomous driving state

- When the ego vehicle is not moving (Current Velocity is very low)
Copy link

@sfukuta sfukuta Sep 19, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Current Velocity is very low

Regarding very low speed, please tell me the flow velocity threshold.
Also, where is it used in the source code?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sfukuta

the flow velocity threshold.

Sorry what do you mean by the flow velocity threshold?

Also, where is it used in the source code?

checking in the following part
https://github.com/tier4/autoware.universe/pull/1528/files#diff-9e6b733808409255bcc5d8a574750015103ce298b94d7d54872ff348f6740d3eR418-R423

  // step2. create velocity data check if the vehicle stops or not
  constexpr double min_moving_velocity_th{0.1};
  const double current_v = current_velocity_ptr_->longitudinal_velocity;
  if (std::abs(current_v) < min_moving_velocity_th) {
    return false;
  }


![backward driving](./image/wrong-mpc.drawio.svg)

## Parameters
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please also add the following parameters to the list.

  • cluster_tolerance
  • cluster_minimum_height
  • minimum_cluster_size
  • maximum_cluster_size

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sfukuta apparently I cannot push new commits to this branch since I get this error:
remote: error: GH006: Protected branch update failed for refs/heads/beta/v0.3.18.2+AEB-update. remote: remote: - Changes must be made through a pull request. remote: remote: - 2 of 2 required status checks are expected. To https://github.com/tier4/autoware.universe.git ! [remote rejected] beta/v0.3.18.2+AEB-update -> beta/v0.3.18.2+AEB-update (protected branch hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to 'https://github.com/tier4/autoware.universe.git'

if your only concerns are about the README please approve this PR and I will make a separate PR to fix the README

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants