[DEPR]: USE-JWT-COOKIE header #371
Assignees
Labels
depr
Proposal for deprecation & removal per OEP-21
Comments
|
Note: This should move to "Removing" once accepted, since this work is in-progress. |
robrap
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 14, 2023
The idea behind this work is to use "forgiving" jwt authentication
when working with JWT cookies, which means that if jwt cookie
authentication fails, we would try other authentication mechanisms,
rather than failing and halting the authentication attempt.
This solution would replace an earlier solution to issues around
jwt cookies that introduced an HTTP_USE_JWT_COOKIE header.
For more background and details, see the new ADR:
0002-remove-use-jwt-cookie-header.rst.
Also contains:
- add custom attributes:
- is_forgiving_jwt_cookies_enabled
- use_jwt_cookie_requested
- has_jwt_cookie
- jwt_auth_result
- ENABLE_FORGIVING_JWT_COOKIES toggle for rollout of what would
be a future breaking change, when we have fully switched to
forgiving jwt cookies.
DEPR for Use-JWT-COOKIE header:
#371
Co-authored-by: Feanil Patel <[email protected]>
robrap
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 20, 2023
Fixes a bug for any service other than the identity service (LMS/CMS), where the session's local service user id would never match the JWT LMS user id when compared. - The custom attribute jwt_auth_mismatch_session_lms_user_id was renamed to jwt_auth_mismatch_session_lms_user_id to make this more clear. - The setting EDX_DRF_EXTENSIONS[LMS_USER_ID_PROPERTY_NAME] was added to enable choosing the user object property that contains the lms_user_id, if one exists. Part of DEPR: #371
10 tasks
robrap
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2023
If ENABLE_FORGIVING_JWT_COOKIES was enabled, there was a bug for any service other than the identity service(LMS/CMS), where the session's local service user id would never match the JWT LMS user id when compared. This has been fixed. - The custom attribute jwt_auth_mismatch_session_lms_user_id was renamed to jwt_auth_mismatch_session_lms_user_id to make this more clear. - The setting EDX_DRF_EXTENSIONS[VERIFY_LMS_USER_ID_PROPERTY_NAME] was added to enable choosing the user object property that contains the lms_user_id, if one exists. If this is unset, a service will simply skip this additional protection. - The custom attribute jwt_auth_get_lms_user_id_status was added to provide observability into the new functionality. BREAKING CHANGE: The breaking change only affects services with ENABLE_FORGIVING_JWT_COOKIES enabled. It now requires the new setting VERIFY_LMS_USER_ID_PROPERTY_NAME to be set in order to provide the original Session vs JWT user id check. Part of DEPR: #371
robrap
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2023
If ENABLE_FORGIVING_JWT_COOKIES was enabled, there was a bug for any service other than the identity service(LMS/CMS), where the session's local service user id would never match the JWT LMS user id when compared. This has been fixed. - The custom attribute jwt_auth_mismatch_session_lms_user_id was renamed to jwt_auth_mismatch_session_lms_user_id to make this more clear. - The setting EDX_DRF_EXTENSIONS[VERIFY_LMS_USER_ID_PROPERTY_NAME] was added to enable choosing the user object property that contains the lms_user_id, if one exists. If this is unset, a service will simply skip this additional protection. - The custom attribute jwt_auth_get_lms_user_id_status was added to provide observability into the new functionality. BREAKING CHANGE: The breaking change only affects services with ENABLE_FORGIVING_JWT_COOKIES enabled. It now requires the new setting VERIFY_LMS_USER_ID_PROPERTY_NAME to be set in order to provide the original Session vs JWT user id check. Part of DEPR: #371
robrap
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2023
If ENABLE_FORGIVING_JWT_COOKIES was enabled, there was a bug for any service other than the identity service(LMS/CMS), where the session's local service user id would never match the JWT LMS user id when compared. This has been fixed. - The custom attribute jwt_auth_mismatch_session_lms_user_id was renamed to jwt_auth_mismatch_session_lms_user_id to make this more clear. - The setting EDX_DRF_EXTENSIONS[VERIFY_LMS_USER_ID_PROPERTY_NAME] was added to enable choosing the user object property that contains the lms_user_id, if one exists. If this is unset, a service will simply skip this additional protection. - The custom attribute jwt_auth_get_lms_user_id_status was added to provide observability into the new functionality. BREAKING CHANGE: The breaking change only affects services with ENABLE_FORGIVING_JWT_COOKIES enabled. It now requires the new setting VERIFY_LMS_USER_ID_PROPERTY_NAME to be set in order to provide the original Session vs JWT user id check. Part of DEPR: #371
robrap
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 22, 2023
When VERIFY_LMS_USER_ID_PROPERTY_NAME is None, uses lms_user_id as a default (only if found). This is to ease deployment. Also uses special value 'skip-check' to disable, in case of emergency. See updated commit message below: --------------------------------- Fixes a bug for any service other than the identity service (LMS/CMS), where the session's local service user id would never match the JWT LMS user id when compared. - The custom attribute jwt_auth_mismatch_session_lms_user_id was renamed to jwt_auth_mismatch_session_lms_user_id to make this more clear. - The setting EDX_DRF_EXTENSIONS[VERIFY_LMS_USER_ID_PROPERTY_NAME] was added to enable choosing the user object property that contains the LMS user id, if one exists. If this is set to None (the default), the check will use the lms_user_id property if it is found, and otherwise will skip this additional protection. In case of an unforeseen issue, use 'skip-check' to skip the check, even when there is an lms_user_id property. - The custom attribute jwt_auth_get_lms_user_id_status was added to provide observability into the new functionality. BREAKING CHANGE: The breaking change only affects services with ENABLE_FORGIVING_JWT_COOKIES enabled. It now requires the new setting VERIFY_LMS_USER_ID_PROPERTY_NAME to be set appropriately in order to provide the existing Session vs JWT user id check. Note that only LMS/CMS will likely need to set this value. Part of DEPR: #371
robrap
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 27, 2023
If ENABLE_FORGIVING_JWT_COOKIES was enabled, there was a bug for any service other than the identity service(LMS/CMS), where the session's local service user id would never match the JWT LMS user id when compared. This has been fixed. - The custom attribute jwt_auth_mismatch_session_lms_user_id was renamed to jwt_auth_mismatch_session_lms_user_id to make this more clear. - The setting EDX_DRF_EXTENSIONS[VERIFY_LMS_USER_ID_PROPERTY_NAME] was added to enable choosing the user object property that contains the LMS user id, if one exists. If this is set to None (the default), the check will use the lms_user_id property if it is found, and otherwise will skip this additional protection. In case of an unforeseen issue, use 'skip-check' to skip the check, even when there is an lms_user_id property. - The custom attribute jwt_auth_get_lms_user_id_status was added to provide observability into the new functionality. BREAKING CHANGE: The breaking change only affects services with ENABLE_FORGIVING_JWT_COOKIES enabled. It now requires the new setting VERIFY_LMS_USER_ID_PROPERTY_NAME to be set appropriately in order to provide the existing Session vs JWT user id check. Note that only LMS/CMS will likely need to set this value, because the default is meant to work in all other services. Part of DEPR: #371
|
A main part of this is complete. I updated the task list in the PR description regarding the long tail. |
MichaelRoytman
added a commit
to edx/edx-exams
that referenced
this issue
Jan 31, 2024
This commit removes references to the edx-drf-extensions USE-JWT-COOKIE constant. This constant was removed in version 10.0.0 of the edx-drf-extensions library. This constant is no longer necessary, because JWT authentication will now be attempted on all requests. This removes the need to set this constant explicitly inthe presence of a JWT cookie. This also removes the need to force an early return for lti endpoints, because edx-drf-extensions will fallback to other forms of authentication in the event that JWT authentication fails. Please see the associated DEPR issue in the edx-drf-extensions library for more information: openedx/edx-drf-extensions#371.
|
Update: I'm working on the next task, trying to get services upgraded. Unfortunately this uncovered an issue that arose in one service (2U-specific), and we've ticketed and will look into this. Private ticket link. |
|
@robrap the internal ticket has been moved to Done. |
8 tasks
|
Update: This ticket is mostly unblocked and the task list in this ticket has been updated to reflect next steps. |
robrap
added a commit
to openedx/edx-platform
that referenced
this issue
Aug 28, 2024
This repo is no longer using USE-JWT-COOKIE header, since it has the required edx-drf-extensions>10.2.0, where it was fully removed. This is final clean-up for this repo. See "[DEPR]: USE-JWT-COOKIE header" for more details: - openedx/edx-drf-extensions#371
robrap
added a commit
to openedx/credentials
that referenced
this issue
Aug 28, 2024
This repo is no longer using USE-JWT-COOKIE header, since it has the required edx-drf-extensions>10.2.0, where it was fully removed. This is final clean-up for this repo. See "[DEPR]: USE-JWT-COOKIE header" for more details: - openedx/edx-drf-extensions#371
3 tasks
robrap
added a commit
to edx/edx-exams
that referenced
this issue
Aug 28, 2024
his repo is no longer using USE-JWT-COOKIE header, since it has the required edx-drf-extensions>10.2.0, where it was fully removed. This is final clean-up for this repo. See "[DEPR]: USE-JWT-COOKIE header" for more details: - openedx/edx-drf-extensions#371
6 tasks
robrap
added a commit
to openedx/enterprise-catalog
that referenced
this issue
Aug 28, 2024
This repo is no longer using USE-JWT-COOKIE header, since it has the required edx-drf-extensions>10.2.0, where it was fully removed. This is final clean-up for this repo. See "[DEPR]: USE-JWT-COOKIE header" for more details: - openedx/edx-drf-extensions#371
2 tasks
robrap
added a commit
to edx/configuration
that referenced
this issue
Aug 29, 2024
Although we may no longer need the USE-JWT-COOKIE header, it could break ecommerce if this were removed at this time. So, we are leaving a comment so we'll see this in any searches, and avoid updating for now. Once all backends, including ecommerce, have edx-drf-extensions>=10.2.0, this could be removed. See "[DEPR]: USE-JWT-COOKIE header" for more details: - openedx/edx-drf-extensions#371
3 tasks
robrap
added a commit
to openedx/edx-platform
that referenced
this issue
Aug 29, 2024
This repo is no longer using USE-JWT-COOKIE header, since it has the required edx-drf-extensions>10.2.0, where it was fully removed. This is final clean-up for this repo. See "[DEPR]: USE-JWT-COOKIE header" for more details: - openedx/edx-drf-extensions#371
robrap
added a commit
to edx/configuration
that referenced
this issue
Aug 29, 2024
Although we may no longer need the USE-JWT-COOKIE header, it could break ecommerce if this were removed at this time. So, we are leaving a comment so we'll see this in any searches, and avoid updating for now. Once all backends, including ecommerce, have edx-drf-extensions>=10.2.0, this could be removed. See "[DEPR]: USE-JWT-COOKIE header" for more details: - openedx/edx-drf-extensions#371
robrap
added a commit
to openedx/enterprise-catalog
that referenced
this issue
Aug 29, 2024
This repo is no longer using USE-JWT-COOKIE header, since it has the required edx-drf-extensions>10.2.0, where it was fully removed. This is final clean-up for this repo. See "[DEPR]: USE-JWT-COOKIE header" for more details: - openedx/edx-drf-extensions#371
robrap
added a commit
to edx/edx-exams
that referenced
this issue
Aug 29, 2024
This repo is no longer using USE-JWT-COOKIE header, since it has the required edx-drf-extensions>10.2.0, where it was fully removed. This is final clean-up for this repo. See "[DEPR]: USE-JWT-COOKIE header" for more details: - openedx/edx-drf-extensions#371
robrap
added a commit
to openedx/credentials
that referenced
this issue
Aug 29, 2024
This repo is no longer using USE-JWT-COOKIE header, since it has the required edx-drf-extensions>10.2.0, where it was fully removed. This is final clean-up for this repo. See "[DEPR]: USE-JWT-COOKIE header" for more details: - openedx/edx-drf-extensions#371
|
UPDATE: After learning that you cannot drop |
robrap
added a commit
to openedx/edx-platform
that referenced
this issue
Aug 29, 2024
This repo is no longer using USE-JWT-COOKIE header, since it has the required edx-drf-extensions>10.2.0, where it was fully removed. This removes all uses of the header, except updating CORS_ALLOW_HEADERS, which can't be done before all MFEs and other callers stop sending the header. See "[DEPR]: USE-JWT-COOKIE header" for more details: - openedx/edx-drf-extensions#371
robrap
added a commit
to openedx/enterprise-catalog
that referenced
this issue
Aug 29, 2024
This repo is no longer using USE-JWT-COOKIE header, since it has the required edx-drf-extensions>10.2.0, where it was fully removed. This removes all uses of the header, except updating CORS_ALLOW_HEADERS, which can't be done before all MFEs and other callers stop sending the header. See "[DEPR]: USE-JWT-COOKIE header" for more details: - openedx/edx-drf-extensions#371
2 tasks
robrap
added a commit
to openedx/enterprise-catalog
that referenced
this issue
Aug 29, 2024
This repo is no longer using USE-JWT-COOKIE header, since it has the required edx-drf-extensions>10.2.0, where it was fully removed. This removes all uses of the header, except updating CORS_ALLOW_HEADERS, which can't be done before all MFEs and other callers stop sending the header. See "[DEPR]: USE-JWT-COOKIE header" for more details: - openedx/edx-drf-extensions#371
robrap
added a commit
to openedx/edx-platform
that referenced
this issue
Aug 30, 2024
This repo is no longer using USE-JWT-COOKIE header, since it has the required edx-drf-extensions>10.2.0, where it was fully removed. This removes all uses of the header, except updating CORS_ALLOW_HEADERS, which can't be done before all MFEs and other callers stop sending the header. See "[DEPR]: USE-JWT-COOKIE header" for more details: - openedx/edx-drf-extensions#371
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Proposal Date
2023-08-14
Target Ticket Acceptance Date
2023-08-18
Earliest Open edX Named Release Without This Functionality
Quince - 2023-10
Rationale
The USE-JWT-COOKIE header was used by MFE's to inform backends when JWT cookies should be used. It has some complexities as detailed in the following ADR proposing its removal. See docs/decisions/0002-remove-use-jwt-cookie-header.rst in #197 (which hasn't merged as-of this initial ticket write up).
The complexity causes confusion, and we'd like to simplify that.
Removal
This PR introduces the replacement and ability to disable the old behavior:
This ticket details some of the follow-up cleanup work for full removal:
Replacement
The PR #197 also introduces the replacement, which is something called "forgiving JWT cookies", where we accept JWT cookies on all requests (not just those with a special header), but if it fails authentication, we allow the endpoint to try other forms of authentication before giving up.
Deprecation
No response
Migration
No response
Additional Info
No response
Task list
Note: To make life simpler for me (@robrap), I left searches for org openedx and edx together on this ticket.
USE-JWT-COOKIEfrom edx-drf-extensions: Support DEPR of USE-JWT-COOKIE with forgiving JWTs edx/edx-arch-experiments#429CORS_ALLOW_HEADERSin order to not break the caller.USE-JWT-COOKIEheader.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: