Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move to ruff for linting and formatting in requirements and workflow file #76

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 24, 2024

Conversation

jatkinson1000
Copy link
Member

As per title after discussions with @MarionBWeinzierl around #75

@jatkinson1000 jatkinson1000 linked an issue Sep 24, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@jatkinson1000 jatkinson1000 self-assigned this Sep 24, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@MarionBWeinzierl MarionBWeinzierl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks fine. Just to mention: You are moving from 3.10 to 3.12 in the same PR, too. Do we need a separate issue for this, or is it fine in one?

Also, are we sure that we have caught all the occurences where pylint is ignored? I would have thought there are more?

@jatkinson1000
Copy link
Member Author

jatkinson1000 commented Sep 24, 2024

I think in one as the use of python is so trivial here.

I did a fresh clone and ran grep -r "pylint" ./ which returned nothing if you're happy with that?
Also just did a search on GitHub for "pylint" and checked all cases match those removed in the PR diff.

@jatkinson1000 jatkinson1000 merged commit e1834cb into main Sep 24, 2024
2 checks passed
@jatkinson1000 jatkinson1000 deleted the ruff-lint branch September 24, 2024 09:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove pylint and replace by ruff
2 participants