Add CI #1
Add CI #1
Conversation
HotelCalifornia
force-pushed
the
feature/ci
branch
2 times, most recently
from
735a445
to
c35e164
Compare
HotelCalifornia
force-pushed
the
feature/ci
branch
from
c35e164
to
1abf257
Compare
| name: linux | ||
| path: build/bundles/* | ||
|
|
||
| build_macos: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Was testing this build, did not work for me. Its complaining about how it can't find the OpenGFX set, even though I have it installed. When I tried running the executable inside the package directly (vs running as the .app folder) it worked 😕 . Maybe it's some weird new macOS security thing? I'm on vacation right now so sadly I don't have a ton of time to look into this, but I'll see what I can do!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it's possible you will need to de-quarantine it yeah. the "simplest" way i found in the past was to xattr -r -d com.apple.quarantine ~/Downloads/bundle.app, but iirc you can also command click it to get the gatekeeper prompt. it's also possible you'll need to change the security setting to allow unsigned apps or downloaded apps to run
There was a problem hiding this comment.
not much we can do about it from this end without a signing key
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it's also possible of course that this is not the problem at all. i can test this on a vm later
| - name: brew update | ||
| run: "brew update" | ||
| - name: install dependencies | ||
| run: "brew install zlib lzo xz libpng freetype fontconfig icu4c sdl2" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I was having some difficulties compiling a version of this for Enjineer a few months ago, brew seemed to be installing only dynamic libs. The executable works on my machine because I have the libraries installed, but I'm thinking this might not work for people who don't have these libraries installed. I have access to a non-brew'ed machine, so I'll give it a test later today.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hm yeah, i'm not sure how to get homebrew to use static libs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
and i have a feeling the same issue will happen with linux
github actions pipeline for any commits on jgrpp or pull requests that target jgrpp