-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 316
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test(MR): run the fancier queue compatibility checks against mainnet #1149
Conversation
TestCase::new( | ||
TestType::Bidirectional { | ||
published_binary: "replicated-state-test".to_string(), | ||
mainnet_version: v.clone(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Merged this into my alin/MR-523-response-deduplication branch (#1071) and it fails in the same way it failed before #1105, because mainnet master
still doesn't have that last change.
I would wait with this until #1105 is on mainnet master
.
Otherwise LGTM, thanks for following up.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah. Let's not postpone your PR for 2 more weeks :)
But it is a maintenance burden that I didn't foresee with these comatibility tests, it takes a long time to get rid of mistakes in test cases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, turns out they're not only backward compatibility, but also forward compatibility tests. (o:
In this case because all the tests / test fixtures we wrote so far never bothered with unique CallbackIds
. But in the future, it may also be the case that we expect canister queues to have certain properties (e.g. some field populated) before we can safely upgrade them. So not only an annoyance.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rubber stamp
Already implemented by Alin at some point |
No description provided.