Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(lidar_apollo_instance_segmentation): fix critical bug #8444

Merged

Conversation

kminoda
Copy link
Contributor

@kminoda kminoda commented Aug 13, 2024

Description

Original code included a critical bug which caused an empty output from apollo node.

Related links

Parent Issue:

  • Link

How was this PR tested?

We've tested with

  • locally running the perception inference with apollo, and confirmed that the node outputs some estimation

Note that this doesn't fix the issues we had internally: https://evaluation.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/2921e69d-65b2-5067-af4b-8fffa4166d74?project_id=prd_jt

Notes for reviewers

None.

Interface changes

None.

Effects on system behavior

None.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the component:perception Advanced sensor data processing and environment understanding. (auto-assigned) label Aug 13, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 13, 2024

Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project!

🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode.

Please ensure:

@kminoda kminoda added the tag:run-build-and-test-differential Mark to enable build-and-test-differential workflow. (used-by-ci) label Aug 13, 2024
@knzo25
Copy link
Contributor

knzo25 commented Aug 13, 2024

🙇

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 23.83%. Comparing base (3551d64) to head (c8c0e65).
Report is 36 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8444      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   23.89%   23.83%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files        1380     1379       -1     
  Lines      101864   101423     -441     
  Branches    38783    38532     -251     
==========================================
- Hits        24343    24174     -169     
+ Misses      75075    74789     -286     
- Partials     2446     2460      +14     
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
differential 0.00% <ø> (?)
total 23.84% <ø> (-0.06%) ⬇️ Carriedforward from aba7e3c

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the component:launch Launch files, scripts and initialization tools. (auto-assigned) label Aug 14, 2024
@kminoda kminoda marked this pull request as ready for review August 14, 2024 06:44
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
<arg name="input/pointcloud" default="/sensing/lidar/concatenated/pointcloud" description="The topic will be used in the detection module"/>
<arg name="mode" default="camera_lidar_fusion" description="options: `camera_lidar_radar_fusion`, `camera_lidar_fusion`, `lidar_radar_fusion`, `lidar` or `radar`"/>
<arg name="data_path" default="$(env HOME)/autoware_data" description="packages data and artifacts directory path"/>
<arg name="lidar_detection_model" default="centerpoint" description="options: `transfusion`, `centerpoint`, `apollo`, `pointpainting`, `clustering`"/>
<arg name="lidar_detection_model" default="apollo" description="options: `transfusion`, `centerpoint`, `apollo`, `pointpainting`, `clustering`"/>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it for debug or want to change default to apollo?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, that's a mistake. Fixed with the latest version.

@kminoda kminoda force-pushed the fix/apollo/add_appropriate_reference branch from 87377f2 to aba7e3c Compare August 14, 2024 07:39
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the component:launch Launch files, scripts and initialization tools. (auto-assigned) label Aug 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@technolojin technolojin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kminoda kminoda added the tag:pr-agent Mark to enable PR-Agent for automated reviews. (used-by-ci) label Aug 15, 2024
@kminoda
Copy link
Contributor Author

kminoda commented Aug 15, 2024

CI keeps failing 😢

Copy link
Contributor

@Shin-kyoto Shin-kyoto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

  • I confirmed that this PR content is good to merge.
    • I checked the CIs passed except build-and-test-differential / clang-tidy-differential (pull_request)
  • I did NOT check this PR by running autoware.

@kminoda kminoda merged commit 1d87bdb into autowarefoundation:main Aug 20, 2024
29 of 30 checks passed
@kminoda kminoda deleted the fix/apollo/add_appropriate_reference branch August 20, 2024 05:44
kyoichi-sugahara pushed a commit to kyoichi-sugahara/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:perception Advanced sensor data processing and environment understanding. (auto-assigned) tag:pr-agent Mark to enable PR-Agent for automated reviews. (used-by-ci) tag:run-build-and-test-differential Mark to enable build-and-test-differential workflow. (used-by-ci)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants