Fix some cops

[archanaserver]

What are the changes introduced in this pull request?

Based on #11009

This pull request addresses the Style/TrailingCommaInArrayLiteral RuboCop offense by ensuring that all multiline array literals in the codebase have a trailing comma after the last item.

Considerations taken when implementing this change?

Ensured that all multiline array literals are updated uniformly with trailing commas.
Verified that the changes do not impact existing functionality or cause syntax errors.

What are the testing steps for this pull request?

bundle exec rubocop

[ianballou]

This PR has no changes in it.

[ianballou]

I think a rebase is needed.

[archanaserver]

@ianballou so i tested with this changes 7efa86e, and it is working fine, at least rubocop is green

[archanaserver]

@ianballou so i tested with this changes 7efa86e, and it is working fine, at least rubocop is green

again it is passing rubocop, with 7efa86e changes. we can merge this one @ianballou.

[ianballou]

Seeing one more rubocop issue:

Error: unrecognized cop Lint/ConstantDefinitionInBlock found in .rubocop_todo.yml, unrecognized cop Lint/RedundantSafeNavigation found in .rubocop_todo.yml, unrecognized cop Lint/UselessMethodDefinition found in .rubocop_todo.yml, unrecognized cop Style/CombinableLoops found in .rubocop_todo.yml

[archanaserver]

Seeing one more rubocop issue:

Error: unrecognized cop Lint/ConstantDefinitionInBlock found in .rubocop_todo.yml, unrecognized cop Lint/RedundantSafeNavigation found in .rubocop_todo.yml, unrecognized cop Lint/UselessMethodDefinition found in .rubocop_todo.yml, unrecognized cop Style/CombinableLoops found in .rubocop_todo.yml

@ianballou it is due to these cops are not compatible with the rubocop version we have in this branch, but i tested with this changes f6a162b and it's all green, may be we can merge this one and see it in #11009. i'm not sure if we can do this, like merging this with rubocop failure? WDYT?

[archanaserver]

@ianballou this is what i was talking about, if we combine #11064 and #11009, passing all rubocop tests #11093

[archanaserver]

@ianballou this is what i was talking about, if we combine #11064 and #11009, passing all rubocop tests #11093

@ianballou in case you missed it, any thoughts on the recent changes?

[ianballou]

@archanaserver rubocop is still failing, was that intentional?

[archanaserver]

@archanaserver rubocop is still failing, was that intentional?

so the changes i have made here, few cops need gem 'theforeman-rubocop', '~> 0.1.0', so that's why the failure was occuring, but i'm trying to do this on our main PR now #11009, where we already upgrade the gem.