Command Alteration: [Voice 1-4] will select a note in that voice if it exists at given position [more...] #42
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…t exists at given position. Voice 1 & 3 commands will cycle to 2 & 4 if selection already is that voice, allowing only needing two shortcuts instead of four to get through all four voices
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Also, importantly in my personal sense, [Voice 1] & [Voice 3] will switch to voices-2 & 4 respectively if the current selection/input state is already voice-1 or 2. This allows the user to either continue with the old behavior, or only require two defined shortcuts to be able to navigate four voices in note entry or to exchange a note.