chore: refactor and export scope terms

[marcoscaceres]

This change (choose one):

• Breaks existing normative behavior (please add label "breaking")
• Adds new normative requirements
• Adds new normative recommendations or optional items
• Makes only editorial changes (only changes informative sections, or
  changes normative sections without changing behavior)
• Is a "chore" (metadata, formatting, fixing warnings, etc).

Commit message:

Export "manifest/within scope" and "URL/within scope".

---

Preview | Diff

[mgiuca]

(FYI, I'm signing off for the weekend. We'll continue the reviews on Monday! Have a good weekend.)

[marcoscaceres]

@mgiuca looks like we were super close on this one and #880. Let me know how you'd like to proceed.

[marcoscaceres]

@mgiuca, I think I've addressed all your feedback... hopefully all good to go!

[marcoscaceres]

@mgiuca, II'l really like to get this landed this week, as then we can land #880 ... or would you prefer #880 to land first?

[marcoscaceres]

Ok, hopefully all good now @mgiuca? 🤞🤞🥺🤞🤞

[mgiuca]

Hrm ... pr-preview doesn't seem to have been updated. It's still stuck on 3ed7528. (Come to think of it ... that's very old, it's plausible that my previous round of reviews I was reviewing an older version than what you had presented..... that might explain why I thought you didn't do some of my suggestions. If so, I'm very sorry.)

[marcoscaceres]

Oh man, that's my fault! argh, how embarrassing. Seems I didn't push.

[mgiuca]

Great! I've dropped a bunch of comments that are mostly nits. Happy with how this ended up. Please take into account my comments, then merge.

I do suspect my previous review was based on an old version. :| sorry.

It can't be that you forgot to push. pr-preview hasn't updated since June 11.

[marcoscaceres]

Great! I've dropped a bunch of comments that are mostly nits. Happy with how this ended up.

Me too! Thanks for all your help. It was a long slog, but this ended up 100 times better!

[mgiuca]

Great, thanks @marcoscaceres !