Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New section on environmental impacts #27

Merged
merged 53 commits into from
Nov 4, 2021
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
53 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
850d182
chore: new section on envrionmental impacts
mprorock Sep 2, 2021
c7355c9
correct spelling
mprorock Sep 2, 2021
7e4093e
correct spelling
mprorock Sep 2, 2021
eb86210
spelling
mprorock Sep 2, 2021
7561e14
spelling
mprorock Sep 2, 2021
29e2d39
chore: updates to include explicit refs to the Ethic web principles
mprorock Sep 3, 2021
b508dbb
chore: update some language around proof of work
mprorock Sep 3, 2021
c961d1f
chore: clean up formating and order of section 7
mprorock Sep 3, 2021
cbb379b
Update index.html to correct spelling and spacing
mprorock Sep 3, 2021
78abe49
chore: update language to remove specifics around proof of work that …
mprorock Sep 3, 2021
a1e9ee4
chore: further language updates
mprorock Sep 3, 2021
1e8fce6
chore: spelling error
mprorock Sep 3, 2021
2fb6306
chore: removed unecessary reference to a ledger approach
mprorock Sep 3, 2021
5fe1f17
language improvement
mprorock Sep 3, 2021
3064e2f
language improvement
mprorock Sep 3, 2021
d65ed98
language improvement
mprorock Sep 3, 2021
4820791
formatting
mprorock Sep 3, 2021
b13b97a
language clarifications
mprorock Sep 3, 2021
22c6943
grammar
mprorock Sep 3, 2021
90d6e16
chore: update and add some clarifying language
mprorock Sep 7, 2021
e4b620c
chore: some minor language mods
mprorock Sep 7, 2021
a0a3a10
Revert "chore: some minor language mods"
mprorock Sep 7, 2021
0fa5901
Revert "chore: update and add some clarifying language"
mprorock Sep 7, 2021
6c798be
Update language around appropriate use of tech
mprorock Sep 9, 2021
93870c3
language improvement
mprorock Sep 14, 2021
02317a8
language improvement
mprorock Sep 14, 2021
5528479
chore: add text to reflect that new section is view of some mebergs o…
mprorock Sep 14, 2021
f578a20
chore: cleanup
mprorock Sep 14, 2021
23a2273
Merge branch 'feature/environmental' of github.com:mesur-io/did-imp-g…
mprorock Sep 14, 2021
989686b
chore: update structure to group items in env section related to view…
mprorock Sep 14, 2021
3839b6c
chore: spelling fix
mprorock Sep 14, 2021
1174832
language clarifications
mprorock Sep 14, 2021
6f51ec9
language improvement
mprorock Sep 15, 2021
06a563a
language improvement
mprorock Sep 15, 2021
67b5c83
spelling
mprorock Sep 15, 2021
9053df0
chore: pull two use cases to PR over to use case doc
mprorock Sep 15, 2021
a476381
Merge branch 'feature/environmental' of github.com:mesur-io/did-imp-g…
mprorock Sep 15, 2021
b0d199f
clarify wording
mprorock Sep 15, 2021
34b7d3a
chore: remove non-normative language based on repeated objections fro…
mprorock Sep 16, 2021
f5b3c95
Update index.html
mprorock Sep 16, 2021
6bf9c01
Update index.html
mprorock Sep 16, 2021
2ee868d
language improvement
mprorock Sep 16, 2021
2d82297
tag formatting
mprorock Sep 16, 2021
1310b0c
language improvement for clarity
mprorock Sep 20, 2021
2e296c1
Improved language
mprorock Sep 21, 2021
35e8147
Improved language
mprorock Sep 21, 2021
171176c
Update to section heading in response to comment from ChristopherA
mprorock Sep 22, 2021
bfe1e39
chore: adjust section and subsection headers
mprorock Sep 22, 2021
961c3cf
chore: update language in section headings
mprorock Sep 22, 2021
e046d08
chore: update to remove section on potential trade offs based on use …
mprorock Sep 22, 2021
b2f7768
update to correct grammar and clarify
mprorock Sep 22, 2021
4e2b768
add clear language related to additional use of existing infrastructure
mprorock Sep 28, 2021
eee9e0c
chore: remove link to PR against rubric to add environmental criteria
mprorock Oct 19, 2021
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
96 changes: 96 additions & 0 deletions index.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1412,6 +1412,102 @@ <h3>Biometrics</h3>
</section>
</section>

<section class="informative">
<h2>Environmental and Ethical Considerations</h2>

<section class="informative">
<h3>Broad Ethical Principles</h3>
<p>
As with all things, strong consideration for the appropriate and ethical use
of technology should be made when implementing items related to DIDs.
</p>
mprorock marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
<p>
A reliable guide for making assessments of various technologies and weighing
ethical considerations is the
<a href="https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/ethical-web-principles/">W3C TAG Ethical Web Principles</a>
document.
</p>
<p>
As noted in the <a href="https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/ethical-web-principles/#principles">Principles</a>
section of the Ethical Web Principles, there are certain key goals that should
apply to all Web standards and technologies, and DIDs support furthering serveral
of these goals explicitly, especially the following
mprorock marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/ethical-web-principles/#privacy">Privacy</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/ethical-web-principles/#control">Individual Control</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/ethical-web-principles/#multi">Device Independence</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
</section>

<section class="informative">
<h3>Energy Usage and Environmental Impacts</h3>
Copy link
Contributor

@csuwildcat csuwildcat Sep 9, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should consider reframing this section to address the issue from an empirical perspective, for example:

Suggested change
<h3>Energy Usage and Environmental Impacts</h3>
<h3>Cost Considerations for Securing Decentralized Identifier Systems</h3>

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed - I think the trick is to fully acknowledge some of the concerns from folks looking at DIDs, but show clearly where we think there are tradeoffs that merit a developer picking one approach vs another. e.g. DIDs engaged in use cases related to requirements for strong personal privacy and control vs other cases

Going to be taking a pass on a rewrite of this whole section today

Copy link

@rxgrant rxgrant Sep 9, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Showing tradeoffs that you think merit one thing or another is inappropriate for guiding implementations, and is appropriate for the Rubric work.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Referring to the Rubric -- including its developing metrics/focuses regarding energy consumption and security features and other features, and the relations between these (which may include notes like "barring special attention, a change in the level of this benefit/cost will typically cause a parallel/inverse/multiple change in the level of that benefit/cost") -- all of which will play a role in deployment choices a/k/a method adoption -- is appropriate for the Implementation Guide.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Securing Decentralized Identifier Systems" is defined in the spec as https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/#dfn-verifiable-data-registry and we should avoid inventing new words for the same concept.

<p>
When implementing or utilizing a DID method, consideration should be given
to the environmental impacts of any underlying technologies. For example
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I support the guidance that one should give consideration to the environmental impacts of any system you build. However, that example is inappropriate as it does not meet any standard of objective review. Rather, it is a political an ideological attack on PoW systems, an attack which is inappropriate for the W3C and this working group to make.

In the same manner, we could demand that people consider the ethical implications of Proof of Stake algorithms which clearly reinforce existing power dynamics leading to a runaway cascade in which the larger, vested players establish an unassailable and therefore, undemocratic authority.

IMO, neither of these are appropriate positions for the W3C and the DID WG to take, precisely because it is not a technical recommendation but a political one.

If some part of the W3C were to develop standards for evaluating the environment impact of technologies, and were willing to apply that standard across the board to all existing and propose technologies, I would welcome that objective, fair framework for discussion.

This is not that.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the same manner, we could demand that people consider the ethical implications of Proof of Stake algorithms which clearly reinforce existing power dynamics leading to a runaway cascade in which the larger, vested players establish an unassailable and therefore, undemocratic authority.

Good call out. Will make some adjustments

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@csuwildcat that would be great. I have adjusted the PR to avoid calling out particular approaches (as obviously these can change over time). Might be optimal if we call out that similar to making assessments on energy usage and comparing those against other benefits of an approach, we should absolutely make assessments related to potential privacy and security over time and that human rights concerns should outweigh others.

there are clear impacts from excess energy use from use of the "proof of work"
approaches in various blockchains or distributed ledgers.
Avoidance of excess energe use, particularly when that energy is sourced
from non-sustainable energy creation methods should be a best practice
that serves the interest of all.
</p>
<p>
The guiding principle that
<a href="https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/ethical-web-principles/#sustainable">the web must be an environmentally sustainable platform</a>
should be followed.
mprorock marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
</p>

<p class="advisement">
Utilizing or authoring DID methods that rely on "proof of work" as part
of their required technical implementation or utilization should be highly
discouraged if not viewed as irresponsible.
mprorock marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
</p>

<p>
When selecting a DID method, the method that minimizes energy consumption
while meeting interoperability and other technical requirements should be
chosen.
</p>

<p class="advisement">
It is strongly recommended that authors of DID methods provide an assessment
of energy usage and impact of their DID method, preferably performed by
an independent third party.
</p>
Copy link
Contributor

@csuwildcat csuwildcat Sep 9, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is really outside the bounds of what a protocol implementer should be asked to do by a developer guide. Additionally, every DID method imaginable (besides self-resolving ones like did:key) will change in consumption and behavior over time, so to ask people to do running third-party energy assessments is particularly strange.

To illustrate how strange this is, imagine you asked everyone using BitTorrent as the basis for file transfer to do an environmental report on all BitTorrent servers, traffic, and resource usage on machines across the world. We should not be injecting ourselves into the use of systems like this, imo.

Suggested change
<p class="advisement">
It is strongly recommended that authors of DID methods provide an assessment
of energy usage and impact of their DID method, preferably performed by
an independent third party.
</p>

</section>

<section class="informative">
<h3>Considerations for Applications related to Human Rights</h3>
<p>
Use of DIDs in furtherance of the improvement of the overall condition of
the human species is highly desirable. Examples of related work where
decentralized technologies have been utilized to prevent use of minerals
sourced from conflict zones may be found in the following reports from
<a href="https://sustainability.google/progress/projects/traceability/">Google</a>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

<3

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@csuwildcat @selfissued does Microsoft have any similar initiatives for ION?

and
<a href="https://www.apple.com/supplier-responsibility/pdf/Apple-Conflict-Minerals-Report.pdf">Apple</a>.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

<3

DIDs serve a unique purpose in supporting privacy and enabling individual
control over identity while also enabing accurate tracing of an individual
mprorock marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
item's provenance to ensure that that item did not originate from use of
forced labor or have other aspects in its production process or supply
chain that were inconsistent with a basic respect for human rights.
</p>

<p>
Use of DIDs to trace the environmental impacts of various supply chains
has already been performed, specifically in areas of food and agricultural
products, and without use of ledgers requiring "proof of work".
This type of usage demonstrates clearly that the new technology can be utilized
in a manner that the consumed energy is balanced by the advantage of being able
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consumed energy is not an appropriate call out here.

I tried to replace that language with "environmental impact" but then the entire sentence didn't make sense.

to understand environmental impacts and make suggestions to actors in
the supply chain under analysis that facilitate improvement of the overall
environmental situation for our shared planet. This type of usage of
DIDs, for areas that help us understand, mitigate, and respond to our shared
crisis of human caused climate change should be promoted.
mprorock marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
</p>
</section>
</section>

<section>
<h2>Future Work</h2>
<p class="note">
Expand Down