Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use GHC 9.10, only relax bounds #14

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2024
Merged

Use GHC 9.10, only relax bounds #14

merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2024

Conversation

amesgen
Copy link
Member

@amesgen amesgen commented May 13, 2024

No need anymore to use anything from head.hackage

No need anymore to use anything from head.hackage
@amesgen amesgen marked this pull request as ready for review May 13, 2024 10:01
@amesgen amesgen requested a review from TerrorJack May 13, 2024 10:02
Copy link
Member

@TerrorJack TerrorJack left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, manually tested deployed 2048. Note that we still test build against ghc-head at https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc-wasm-meta/-/blob/master/.gitlab-ci.yml?ref_type=heads#L145 for the time being, we'll see if it's worthwhile to add a bit of ghc-head specific logic in cabal.project in case of future breakages there.

@amesgen amesgen added this pull request to the merge queue May 13, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit b1299e9 May 13, 2024
4 checks passed
@amesgen amesgen deleted the ghc-9.10.1 branch May 13, 2024 10:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants