Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 10, 2021. It is now read-only.

Docs(reference): add some more ports #1775

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions reference/architecture/index.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -128,8 +128,11 @@ By default Spinnaker binds ports according to the following table
| Fiat | 7003 |
| Front50 | 8080 |
| Gate | 8084 |
| Gate x509 | 8085 |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this saying that when you use x509 authentication for Gate it instead listens on port 8085? I'm using this and it's still listening in 8084...when does it listen on 8085?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need to check with SME on this as I haven't enabled x509 and simply based this on internal doc. Stay tuned : )

| Halyard | 8064 |
| Igor | 8088 |
| Kayenta | 8090 |
| Orca | 8083 |
| Rosco | 8087 |
| Redis | 6379 |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it make sense to pull these into their own section, as we're really documenting defaults of external services we don't control here? It does seem useful to have the ports they listen on handy as you often need to run commands against them to check the state of data, but maybe as an "external services" section?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like this idea!! Will add these edits soon thx

| MariaDB | 3306 |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this reference MySQL instead? From the docs it looks like it's a pretty specific use case to use the MariaDB connector to connect to AWS and most people will just be using a MySQL installation.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. Could say either/or but to me MySQL and Maria are analogous so, +1. Will update