Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use destination definition name in place of string for custom object #3746

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 20, 2024

Conversation

yashasvibajpai
Copy link
Contributor

@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai commented Sep 20, 2024

What are the changes introduced in this PR?

Write a brief explainer on your code changes.

What is the related Linear task?

Resolves INT-2664

Please explain the objectives of your changes below

Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here

Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?

N/A

Any new dependencies introduced with this change?

N/A

Any new generic utility introduced or modified. Please explain the changes.

N/A

Any technical or performance related pointers to consider with the change?

N/A

@coderabbitai review


Developer checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project

  • No breaking changes are being introduced.

  • All related docs linked with the PR?

  • All changes manually tested?

  • Any documentation changes needed with this change?

  • Is the PR limited to 10 file changes?

  • Is the PR limited to one linear task?

  • Are relevant unit and component test-cases added in new readability format?

Reviewer checklist

  • Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?

  • Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.

@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.69%. Comparing base (0dbf74c) to head (c345498).
Report is 5 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3746      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    88.65%   88.69%   +0.04%     
===========================================
  Files          594      594              
  Lines        32409    32413       +4     
  Branches      7730     7725       -5     
===========================================
+ Hits         28732    28750      +18     
- Misses        3354     3372      +18     
+ Partials       323      291      -32     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 20, 2024

@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai self-assigned this Sep 20, 2024
@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai changed the title chore: fix salesforce custom object externalId issue fix: use destination definition name in place of string for custom object Sep 20, 2024
@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai merged commit 27040b0 into develop Sep 20, 2024
28 checks passed
@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai deleted the fix.sf.oauth.custom.object.dev branch September 20, 2024 07:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants