Enum attributes

[krakow10]

For #383

This is my guess as to how to implement this, assuming there is some sort of string in the serialized attributes. It builds but it does not work. Some sort of reflection database error that I don't know what it means.

thread 'main' panicked at /home/quat/git/rbx-dom/rbx_reflection_database/src/lib.rs:7:76:
could not decode reflection database because: invalid type: integer `0`, expected struct Enum
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace

[krakow10]

println!("heyyy name={} value={}", enum_name, enum_value);

I guessed right 😎
still don't know how to work the reflection database

[Dekkonot]

It builds but it does not work. Some sort of reflection database error that I don't know what it means.

This is because you're changing the (de)serialization of Enum! As a result, the reflection database can't be deserialized by the new version you're making.

Fixing this is an involved processs because we bootstrap the database. As a result I don't really recommend you try to fix it because it's potentially error prone and involves a bit of juggling with reflection databases.

PS: We have the enum attributes documented in the spec file we maintain. You didn't have to guess. 😄

[krakow10]

What about a separate explicit enum type, like this?

[krakow10]

This branch is now set up so that it suppresses the enum attribute errors and provides weakly typed enum functionality. The explicit enum is moved to a different branch, never to be heard from again.

[Dekkonot]

This implementation would fail a round-trip test because Enums no longer contain information on their type.

[krakow10]

Well yes... but this is still useful as an error-suppressing patch while the full functionality isn't available

[Dekkonot]

I will put aside time next week to fix this properly since it's showing up in the wild now, but I'm not willing to merge a feature that doesn't roundtrip. We won't be making a new release without the full feature anyway, so it being temporary fix is moot.

If it's desperate, I'd suggest using a custom fork of whatever tool you're using for the next little while.

[krakow10]

I don't think it should be merged either which is why I have it as a draft, sorry for the misunderstanding. I'm not trying to get this incomplete feature merged, just a publicly available error fixer