Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(manager/ocb): implement providers support #31754

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Ashmithelps
Copy link

@Ashmithelps Ashmithelps commented Oct 2, 2024

Changes

Context

closes #31747

Documentation (please check one with an [x])

  • I have updated the documentation, or
  • No documentation update is required

How I've tested my work (please select one)

I have verified these changes via:

  • Code inspection only, or
  • Newly added/modified unit tests, or
  • No unit tests but ran on a real repository, or
  • Both unit tests + ran on a real repository

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Oct 2, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@Ashmithelps
Copy link
Author

can anyone help me , i cant figure out where i am failing

@secustor
Copy link
Collaborator

secustor commented Oct 2, 2024

You need have PR title which follows conventional commit conventions

Also I see no documentation changes or unit tests as your choices in the form PR template forms suggest.

@secustor secustor changed the title fixed providers, as much as i understood , do let me know if did something wrong feat(manager/ocb): implement providers support Oct 2, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Revert all these changes.

Only changes in lib/modules/manager/ocb are necessary

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i just made the changes in , extract.ts and schema.ts , but how come these many changes have been made

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you probably worked on wrong base branch.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add tests to cover the providers too.

@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ export function extractPackageFile(
deps.push(...processModule(definition.extensions, 'extensions'));
deps.push(...processModule(definition.processors, 'processors'));
deps.push(...processModule(definition.receivers, 'receivers'));

deps.push(...processModule(definition.providers,'providers'));
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
deps.push(...processModule(definition.providers,'providers'));
deps.push(...processModule(definition.providers,'providers'));

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

OCB: add support for provider references
4 participants