Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade pillow from 9.5.0 to 10.2.0 #122

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rbanffy
Copy link
Owner

@rbanffy rbanffy commented Jan 25, 2024

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `pip` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • requirements.txt

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

By pinning:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Upgrade Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
critical severity 843/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 9
Eval Injection
SNYK-PYTHON-PILLOW-6182918
pillow:
9.5.0 -> 10.2.0
No Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Eval Injection

The following vulnerabilities are fixed by pinning transitive dependencies:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-PILLOW-6182918
Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Type: Unknown

PR Summary: Unable to parse review summary response from 'json\n{\n "type": "Security upgrade",\n "body": "The pull request addresses a critical security vulnerability by upgrading the Pillow library from version 9.5.0 to 10.2.0. This upgrade mitigates the risk associated with an eval injection vulnerability that has been recently disclosed and for which a fix is available.",\n "suggestions": [\n "Ensure that the upgrade to Pillow 10.2.0 does not introduce any compatibility issues with the project\'s existing codebase.",\n "Verify that all functionalities that rely on the Pillow library are still working as expected after the upgrade.",\n "Consider reviewing the project\'s dependency management practices to prevent similar security vulnerabilities in the future."\n ],\n "addresses_issue": true\n}\n'. Try re-running the review or contact [email protected] for help.

Decision: Comment

📝 Type: 'Unknown' - not supported yet.
  • Sourcery currently only approves 'Typo fix' PRs.
📝 Issue not addressed: this change does not correctly address the issue or implement the desired feature.
No details provided.
📝 Complexity: the changes are too large or complex for Sourcery to approve.
  • Unsupported files: the diff contains files that Sourcery does not currently support during reviews.

Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨

Share Sourcery

Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants