Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(install): set v1.8.0 as upper-bound on userpath #1034

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

safl
Copy link

@safl safl commented Aug 7, 2023

This fixes the functional regression introduced by userpath v1.9.0. For details see issue #1025.

@dukecat0
Copy link
Member

I guess we don't need this anymore since userpath v1.9.1 has been released.

@uranusjr
Copy link
Member

Or add a !=1.9.0 instead?

This fixes the functional regression introduced by userpath v1.9.0. For
details see issue pypa#1025.

Signed-off-by: Simon A. F. Lund <[email protected]>
@safl
Copy link
Author

safl commented Sep 15, 2023

I have bumped the version number, yet still keeping an upper-bound.
Without an upper-bound, then pipx is open for regressions from userpath.

@uranusjr
Copy link
Member

uranusjr commented Oct 5, 2023

I don’t think it is a good idea to add an upper bound. If the regression reasoning is followed, we should add upper bounds to all dependencies.

@safl
Copy link
Author

safl commented Oct 5, 2023

I don’t think it is a good idea to add an upper bound. If the regression reasoning is followed, we should add upper bounds to all dependencies.

Yes. From my perspective then adding upper bounds on all dependencies is preferable to arbitrary functional regression.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants