Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update to numericalnim 0.8.8 #214

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 9, 2023

Conversation

HugoGranstrom
Copy link
Collaborator

@HugoGranstrom HugoGranstrom commented Aug 9, 2023

This should fix numerical for Nim 2.0. Fixes #213

Copy link
Owner

@pietroppeter pietroppeter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, thanks!

I was curious about the breaking change in numericalnim and I ended up having a quick look at SciNim/numericalnim#25 :)

@HugoGranstrom HugoGranstrom merged commit 68ce786 into pietroppeter:main Aug 9, 2023
5 checks passed
@HugoGranstrom
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Nice! :D Yes, it's such a small change but it has taken me years to actually update it. I've always just accepted that numerical.nim never compiles locally because I had a newer version of numericalnim 🤣

quimt added a commit to quimt/nimib that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update numerical example to latest numericalnim version
2 participants