correlation alerts

[eirsep]

Description

[Describe what this change achieves]

Issues Resolved

[List any issues this PR will resolve]

Check List

• New functionality includes testing.
  • All tests pass
• New functionality has been documented.
  • New functionality has javadoc added
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[jowg-amazon]

should be correlation_rule_names? to remain consistent with CorrelationAlert

[riysaxen-amzn]

How about this?

correlation_id": {
        "type": "nested",
        "properties": {
         "correlation_rule_ids": {
            "type": "keyword"
          },
          "correlation_rule_names": {
            "type": "keyword"
          }
      }
}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 264 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 24.30%. Comparing base (8ef0a3f) to head (1848d8c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...arch/securityanalytics/model/CorrelationAlert.java	0.00%	206 Missing ⚠️
...ics/correlation/alert/CorrelationAlertService.java	0.00%	52 Missing ⚠️
...ytics/correlation/alert/CorrelationAlertsList.java	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #877      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     24.82%   24.30%   -0.52%     
+ Complexity     1030     1029       -1     
============================================
  Files           277      280       +3     
  Lines         12717    12966     +249     
  Branches       1401     1420      +19     
============================================
- Hits           3157     3152       -5     
- Misses         9296     9550     +254     
  Partials        264      264              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[jowg-amazon]

nit: can we move the ActionListener as the last parameter for consistency?