feat: imagePullJob support Tolerations

[zerunhu]

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

The ImagePullJob supports a tolerations field to tolerate node taints.

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

#1694

Ⅲ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅳ. Special notes for reviews

[kruise-bot]

Welcome @zerunhu! It looks like this is your first PR to openkruise/kruise 🎉

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 67.85714% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 49.34%. Comparing base (0d0031a) to head (cff4e59).
Report is 91 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
pkg/util/imagejob/imagejob_reader.go	79.16%	4 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...controller/imagepulljob/imagepulljob_controller.go	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1705      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   47.91%   49.34%   +1.42%     
==========================================
  Files         162      191      +29     
  Lines       23491    19636    -3855     
==========================================
- Hits        11256     9689    -1567     
+ Misses      11014     8688    -2326     
- Partials     1221     1259      +38     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	49.34% <67.85%> (+1.42%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[zerunhu]

While testing E2E, I found that a Node had a Taint added.

[
      {
          "key": "node-role.kubernetes.io/control-plane",
          "effect": "NoSchedule"
      }
]

Due to the Toleration feature of the imagePullJob, it won't be scheduled, causing the test to fail. I realized that I need to modify a large amount of code in test/e2e/apps/pullimages.go. I hope to get some help on how to make these modifications more effectively. @furykerry

[zmberg]

/lgtm

[kruise-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from zmberg by writing /assign @zmberg in a comment. For more information see:The Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[zerunhu]

The test has passed. Could you please help review this PR?
@furykerry @zmberg

[zmberg]

/hold

[zerunhu]

Hello, I have pulled your latest fix code, and all tests have passed now. Could you please help review the PR again? Since I am a beginner with Kruise, I hope you can provide me with some information on what I should do next. @zmberg