Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Update to the new version of brand-openedx in the new scope. #1216

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 20, 2023

Conversation

feanil
Copy link
Contributor

@feanil feanil commented Oct 20, 2023

Part of openedx/axim-engineering#23

This updates the @edx/brand alias to point to the brand-openedx package at
the openedx scope. This does not impact imports because this package is used
via an alias.

Part of openedx/axim-engineering#23

This updates the `@edx/brand` alias to point to the `brand-openedx` package at
the `openedx` scope. This does not impact imports because this package is used
via an alias.
@feanil feanil requested a review from a team October 20, 2023 14:23
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 20, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (62465ec) 88.09% compared to head (e198802) 88.14%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1216      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.09%   88.14%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         268      268              
  Lines        4537     4537              
  Branches     1145     1145              
==========================================
+ Hits         3997     3999       +2     
+ Misses        526      524       -2     
  Partials       14       14              

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@brian-smith-tcril brian-smith-tcril left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

Comment on lines +3490 to +3495
"node_modules/@edx/frontend-lib-learning-assistant/node_modules/@edx/brand": {
"name": "@edx/brand-openedx",
"version": "1.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@edx/brand-openedx/-/brand-openedx-1.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-r4PDN3rCgDsLovW44ayxoNNHgG5I4Rvss6MG5CrQEX4oW8YhQVEod+jJtwR5vi0mFLN2GIaMlDpd7iIy03VqXg=="
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was hoping we could avoid this by getting the scope change into frontend-lib-learning-assistant but as soon as I made a PR there I failed the edx CLA check. I guess we'll just have to live with mismatched deps for now.

@brian-smith-tcril brian-smith-tcril merged commit 00e7680 into master Oct 20, 2023
6 checks passed
@brian-smith-tcril brian-smith-tcril deleted the feanil/update_brand_dependency branch October 20, 2023 17:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants