Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add advanced plots to IBMA report #864

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Jan 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

JulioAPeraza
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes None.

Changes proposed in this pull request:

  • Add a bar plot showing the percentage of valid voxels per study.
  • Add a summary stats plot showing different statistics from the distribution of the images.

@JulioAPeraza JulioAPeraza added enhancement New feature or request ibma Issues/PRs pertaining to image-based meta-analysis labels Jan 18, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (eb19ff6) 88.20% compared to head (25bd72e) 88.27%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #864      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.20%   88.27%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          48       48              
  Lines        6335     6370      +35     
==========================================
+ Hits         5588     5623      +35     
  Misses        747      747              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@jdkent jdkent left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, I had one comment, but that can be done in a separate pull request when that becomes relevant.

key_maps = (
"z_maps"
if "z_maps" in self.results.estimator.inputs_["raw_data"]
else "beta_maps"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

per our conversation, the beta maps by themselves do not make much sense to compare across studies, but that can be a different pull request.

@jdkent jdkent merged commit 4f687a8 into neurostuff:main Jan 19, 2024
20 checks passed
@JulioAPeraza JulioAPeraza deleted the enh-ibma-report branch January 22, 2024 16:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request ibma Issues/PRs pertaining to image-based meta-analysis
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants