Skip to content

mitmedialab/ai-superstition

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

14 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

AI Prophecy Studies

Eunhae Lee (MIT Media Lab), Pat Pataranutaporn (MIT Media Lab), Judith Amores (Microsoft Research), and Pattie Maes (MIT Media Lab)

Corresponding Authors

Eunhae Lee ([email protected]) & Pat Pataranutaporn ([email protected])

This is a repository for the following study:

Super-intelligence or Superstition? Exploring Psychological Factors Underlying Unwarranted Belief in AI Predictions

Abstract

This study investigates psychological factors influencing belief in AI predictions about personal behavior, comparing it to belief in astrology and personality-based predictions. Through an experiment with 238 participants, we examined how cognitive style, paranormal beliefs, AI attitudes, personality traits, and other factors affect perceived validity, reliability, usefulness, and personalization of predictions from different sources. Our findings reveal that belief in AI predictions is positively correlated with belief in predictions based on astrology and personality psychology. Notably, paranormal beliefs and positive AI attitudes significantly increased perceived validity, reliability, usefulness, and personalization of AI predictions. Conscientiousness was negatively correlated with belief in predictions across all sources, and interest in the prediction topic increased believability across predictions. Surprisingly, cognitive style did not significantly influence belief in predictions. These results highlight the "rational superstition" phenomenon in AI, where belief is driven more by mental heuristics and intuition than critical evaluation. We discuss implications for designing AI systems and communication strategies that foster appropriate trust and skepticism. This research contributes to our understanding of the psychology of human-AI interaction and offers insights for the design and deployment of AI systems.

See paper: https://www.arxiv.org/abs/2408.06602

Repository Structure

├── Data/
│   ├── Raw/
│   ├── Processed/
│   └── Code/
├── Prototype/
│   └── Web_Application/
└── Supplementary/
    └── Survey/

Repository Contents

Data

  • Raw: Original, unprocessed, and de-identified data collected during the study.
  • Processed: Cleaned and formatted data used for analysis.
  • Code: Scripts and notebooks used for data analysis and visualization.

Prototype

  • Web Application: Implementation of assessments, simulated investment game, and prophecy generation.

Supplementary

  • Survey: Survey materials and questionnaires used in the study.

Usage

[Provide instructions on how to use the code and data in this repository]

Citation

[Provide the citation for the paper once published]

License

[Specify the license under which this research and its materials are released]

Acknowledgements

[Include any acknowledgements, funding sources, or other credits]