-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
io_uring support #3419
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
io_uring support #3419
Conversation
8b7c9f3
to
524eea4
Compare
847d358
to
d401259
Compare
d9fefcf
to
2747a2b
Compare
71564e3
to
81ae9ec
Compare
Added 'io_uring' support to LISA io perf tests and new testcase 'perf_nvme_io_uring'
500db48
to
09959a5
Compare
@@ -37,6 +38,25 @@ class NvmePerformace(TestSuite): | |||
), | |||
) | |||
def perf_nvme(self, node: Node, result: TestResult) -> None: | |||
self._perf_nvme(node, IoEngine.LIBAIO, result) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Update test case comments to specify what io engine is used.
requirement=simple_requirement( | ||
supported_features=[Nvme], | ||
), | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
for perf_nvme, it has requirement for count of nvme disks, for perf_nvme_io_uring, by default it uses 1 nvme disk, is it expected?
Added 'io_uring' support to LISA io perf tests and a new testcase 'perf_nvme_io_uring'.
io_uring is advanced alternative for libaio with low system overhead and more io depth.