Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add device-passthrough testcase for CH platform #3415

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

smit-gardhariya
Copy link
Collaborator

Add test case to verify if passthrough-devices
are visible to guest for CH platform

}
pool_vendor_device_map[pool_type] = vendor_device_id

assert environment.runbook.nodes_requirement, "requirement cant be empty"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not understand the logic, why does it need to check platform runbook and node runbook both? They should be expected values, and one of them should be enough to provide the expected value.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Device pool is part of platform runbook whereas what kind of device need to be assigned from pool is part of node runbook.

Platform runbook defines the pool configuration
Node runbook defines how many devices/what kind of devices need to be passthrough under requirement section

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@smit-gardhariya smit-gardhariya Sep 13, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here is the reference @squirrelsc

platform:
  -type: cloud-hypervisor
      cloud-hypervisor:
      device_pools:
        - type: "pci_net"
	  devices:
	    - vendor_id: xxx
	      device_id: xxx
    requirement:
      cloud-hypervisor:
        device_passthrough:
	  -pool_type: "pci_net"
	    managed: "yes"
	    count: 1

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use node.runbook, instead of nodes_requirement. The nodes_requirements may be expanded to multiple nodes.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We are using extended runbook only. Let me check if is there other better way to get the runbook.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using extended runbook only to get the expected value.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please check Azure platform code. the runbook should be merged, and copied to each node. The nodes_requirement is the raw info to create nodes, which shouldn't be used for each environment.

node.capability.set_extended_runbook(azure_node_runbook)

@smit-gardhariya smit-gardhariya force-pushed the sgardhariya/verify_device_passthrough branch from 4504c04 to 0d77e02 Compare September 18, 2024 13:38
Add test case to verify if passthrough-devices
are visible to guest for CH platform

Signed-off-by: Smit Gardhariya <[email protected]>
@smit-gardhariya smit-gardhariya force-pushed the sgardhariya/verify_device_passthrough branch from 0d77e02 to d50a39f Compare September 18, 2024 13:40
BaseLibvirtNodeSchema, CLOUD_HYPERVISOR
)
if not node_runbook.device_passthrough:
raise SkippedException("No device-passthrough is set for node")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This check should happen earlier before any other command.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants