perf: improve applyOrdering by avoid call to GetByCurrentId #5079

chlunde · 2023-03-07T22:00:36Z

This shaves of 14 seconds (one third) of the execution time for a kustomization tree with 4000 documents, from 40.68s to 27.41s

        0     0%  5.44%     18.42s 40.56%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/krusty.(*Kustomizer).applySortOrder
        0     0%  5.44%     18.40s 40.52%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/builtins.applyOrdering

before

(pprof) top20 -cum
Showing nodes accounting for 5.85s, 12.88% of 45.41s total
Dropped 622 nodes (cum <= 0.23s)
Showing top 20 nodes out of 157
    flat  flat%   sum%        cum   cum%
        0     0%     0%     40.68s 89.58%  github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute
        0     0%     0%     40.68s 89.58%  github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC
        0     0%     0%     40.68s 89.58%  github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute
        0     0%     0%     40.68s 89.58%  main.main
        0     0%     0%     40.68s 89.58%  runtime.main
        0     0%     0%     40.68s 89.58%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kustomize/v5/commands/build.NewCmdBuild.func1
        0     0%     0%     40.12s 88.35%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/krusty.(*Kustomizer).Run
    0.51s  1.12%  1.12%     33.20s 73.11%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resource.(*Resource).CurId
        0     0%  1.12%     26.95s 59.35%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resmap.(*resWrangler).GetMatchingResourcesByCurrentId
    0.35s  0.77%  1.89%     26.95s 59.35%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resmap.(*resWrangler).filteredById
    0.07s  0.15%  2.05%     25.53s 56.22%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resmap.GetCurrentId
        0     0%  2.05%     21.68s 47.74%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/target.(*KustTarget).MakeCustomizedResMap (inline)
        0     0%  2.05%     21.68s 47.74%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/target.(*KustTarget).makeCustomizedResMap
    0.54s  1.19%  3.24%     19.75s 43.49%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resource.(*Resource).GetGvk (inline)
        1s  2.20%  5.44%     19.21s 42.30%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kyaml/resid.GvkFromNode
        0     0%  5.44%     18.42s 40.56%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/builtins.(*SortOrderTransformerPlugin).Transform
        0     0%  5.44%     18.42s 40.56%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/krusty.(*Kustomizer).applySortOrder
        0     0%  5.44%     18.40s 40.52%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/builtins.applyOrdering
    0.87s  1.92%  7.36%     16.55s 36.45%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kyaml/yaml.visitMappingNodeFields
    2.51s  5.53% 12.88%     15.68s 34.53%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kyaml/yaml.visitFieldsWhileTrue

after

(pprof) top20 -cum
Showing nodes accounting for 1.23s, 3.85% of 31.98s total
Dropped 584 nodes (cum <= 0.16s)
Showing top 20 nodes out of 184
    flat  flat%   sum%        cum   cum%
        0     0%     0%     27.41s 85.71%  github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute
        0     0%     0%     27.41s 85.71%  github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC
        0     0%     0%     27.41s 85.71%  github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute
        0     0%     0%     27.41s 85.71%  main.main
        0     0%     0%     27.41s 85.71%  runtime.main
        0     0%     0%     27.41s 85.71%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kustomize/v5/commands/build.NewCmdBuild.func1
        0     0%     0%     26.85s 83.96%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/krusty.(*Kustomizer).Run
        0     0%     0%     22.07s 69.01%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/target.(*KustTarget).MakeCustomizedResMap (inline)
        0     0%     0%     22.07s 69.01%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/target.(*KustTarget).makeCustomizedResMap
    0.38s  1.19%  1.19%     20.69s 64.70%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resource.(*Resource).CurId
        0     0%  1.19%     13.64s 42.65%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resmap.(*resWrangler).Append
        0     0%  1.19%     13.55s 42.37%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resmap.(*resWrangler).GetMatchingResourcesByCurrentId (inline)
    0.12s  0.38%  1.56%     13.55s 42.37%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resmap.(*resWrangler).filteredById
    0.01s 0.031%  1.59%     12.67s 39.62%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resmap.GetCurrentId
    0.21s  0.66%  2.25%     12.49s 39.06%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resource.(*Resource).GetGvk (inline)
    0.51s  1.59%  3.85%     12.28s 38.40%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kyaml/resid.GvkFromNode
        0     0%  3.85%     11.52s 36.02%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/target.(*KustTarget).IgnoreLocal
        0     0%  3.85%     10.53s 32.93%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/target.(*KustTarget).AccumulateTarget
        0     0%  3.85%     10.53s 32.93%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/target.(*KustTarget).accumulateResources
        0     0%  3.85%     10.53s 32.93%  sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/target.(*KustTarget).accumulateTarget

k8s-ci-robot · 2023-03-07T22:00:44Z

Welcome @chlunde!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/kustomize 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/kustomize has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

k8s-ci-robot · 2023-03-07T22:00:45Z

Hi @chlunde. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

koba1t · 2023-03-08T18:55:49Z

/ok-to-test

api/internal/builtins/SortOrderTransformer.go

koba1t · 2023-03-08T19:14:58Z

/lgtm

natasha41575 · 2023-03-10T17:14:12Z

@yanniszark Do you have time to take a look at this one?

yanniszark

@chlunde thanks a lot for your perf PRs, they are greatly needed and will massively improve the user experience.
I left 2 comments for small changes but overall if this passes tests it should be good to go.

api/internal/builtins/SortOrderTransformer.go

koba1t · 2023-03-22T19:02:37Z

/triage accepted
/kind feature
/priority important-longterm

k8s-triage-robot · 2023-06-20T20:02:56Z

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
Close this PR with /close
Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

k8s-triage-robot · 2023-07-20T20:27:20Z

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
Close this PR with /close
Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

api/internal/builtins/SortOrderTransformer.go

This shaves of 14 seconds (one third) of the execution time for a kustomization tree with 4000 documents, from 40.68s to 27.41s 0 0% 5.44% 18.42s 40.56% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/krusty.(*Kustomizer).applySortOrder 0 0% 5.44% 18.40s 40.52% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/builtins.applyOrdering before (pprof) top20 -cum Showing nodes accounting for 5.85s, 12.88% of 45.41s total Dropped 622 nodes (cum <= 0.23s) Showing top 20 nodes out of 157 flat flat% sum% cum cum% 0 0% 0% 40.68s 89.58% github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute 0 0% 0% 40.68s 89.58% github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC 0 0% 0% 40.68s 89.58% github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute 0 0% 0% 40.68s 89.58% main.main 0 0% 0% 40.68s 89.58% runtime.main 0 0% 0% 40.68s 89.58% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kustomize/v5/commands/build.NewCmdBuild.func1 0 0% 0% 40.12s 88.35% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/krusty.(*Kustomizer).Run 0.51s 1.12% 1.12% 33.20s 73.11% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resource.(*Resource).CurId 0 0% 1.12% 26.95s 59.35% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resmap.(*resWrangler).GetMatchingResourcesByCurrentId 0.35s 0.77% 1.89% 26.95s 59.35% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resmap.(*resWrangler).filteredById 0.07s 0.15% 2.05% 25.53s 56.22% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resmap.GetCurrentId 0 0% 2.05% 21.68s 47.74% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/target.(*KustTarget).MakeCustomizedResMap (inline) 0 0% 2.05% 21.68s 47.74% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/target.(*KustTarget).makeCustomizedResMap 0.54s 1.19% 3.24% 19.75s 43.49% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resource.(*Resource).GetGvk (inline) 1s 2.20% 5.44% 19.21s 42.30% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kyaml/resid.GvkFromNode 0 0% 5.44% 18.42s 40.56% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/builtins.(*SortOrderTransformerPlugin).Transform 0 0% 5.44% 18.42s 40.56% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/krusty.(*Kustomizer).applySortOrder 0 0% 5.44% 18.40s 40.52% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/builtins.applyOrdering 0.87s 1.92% 7.36% 16.55s 36.45% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kyaml/yaml.visitMappingNodeFields 2.51s 5.53% 12.88% 15.68s 34.53% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kyaml/yaml.visitFieldsWhileTrue after (pprof) top20 -cum Showing nodes accounting for 1.23s, 3.85% of 31.98s total Dropped 584 nodes (cum <= 0.16s) Showing top 20 nodes out of 184 flat flat% sum% cum cum% 0 0% 0% 27.41s 85.71% github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute 0 0% 0% 27.41s 85.71% github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC 0 0% 0% 27.41s 85.71% github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute 0 0% 0% 27.41s 85.71% main.main 0 0% 0% 27.41s 85.71% runtime.main 0 0% 0% 27.41s 85.71% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kustomize/v5/commands/build.NewCmdBuild.func1 0 0% 0% 26.85s 83.96% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/krusty.(*Kustomizer).Run 0 0% 0% 22.07s 69.01% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/target.(*KustTarget).MakeCustomizedResMap (inline) 0 0% 0% 22.07s 69.01% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/target.(*KustTarget).makeCustomizedResMap 0.38s 1.19% 1.19% 20.69s 64.70% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resource.(*Resource).CurId 0 0% 1.19% 13.64s 42.65% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resmap.(*resWrangler).Append 0 0% 1.19% 13.55s 42.37% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resmap.(*resWrangler).GetMatchingResourcesByCurrentId (inline) 0.12s 0.38% 1.56% 13.55s 42.37% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resmap.(*resWrangler).filteredById 0.01s 0.031% 1.59% 12.67s 39.62% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resmap.GetCurrentId 0.21s 0.66% 2.25% 12.49s 39.06% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resource.(*Resource).GetGvk (inline) 0.51s 1.59% 3.85% 12.28s 38.40% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kyaml/resid.GvkFromNode 0 0% 3.85% 11.52s 36.02% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/target.(*KustTarget).IgnoreLocal 0 0% 3.85% 10.53s 32.93% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/target.(*KustTarget).AccumulateTarget 0 0% 3.85% 10.53s 32.93% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/target.(*KustTarget).accumulateResources 0 0% 3.85% 10.53s 32.93% sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/internal/target.(*KustTarget).accumulateTarget

chlunde · 2023-10-30T21:35:29Z

I believe I've addressed the comments, can you take another look? Thanks!

chlunde · 2023-11-13T08:26:30Z

@natasha41575 or @yanniszark - can we get this merged? I'd like some input on how to structure the next PR #5427 but since it creates merge conflicts with this PR it would be better if this is merged first.

chlunde · 2023-11-22T12:17:59Z

Hi, @koba1t can we get this merged? Thanks for taking a look :)

koba1t · 2023-11-22T17:01:59Z

@natasha41575
Could you recheck this PR?
I think you reviewed this PR and I want to hear your opinions.

chlunde · 2024-01-08T07:26:59Z

@natasha41575 could you check this again or delegate to someone else?

chlunde · 2024-01-19T18:01:19Z

@chlunde thanks a lot for your perf PRs, they are greatly needed and will massively improve the user experience. I left 2 comments for small changes but overall if this passes tests it should be good to go.

@yanniszark I believe I've addressed your comments, could we get this merged now?

yanniszark · 2024-02-06T19:16:32Z

Hi @chlunde and sorry for the late reply!
I don't have any merging capabilities unfortunately.
The current approvers are @varshaprasad96 @koba1t @KnVerey

koba1t · 2024-02-06T20:40:15Z

HI @yanniszark
If you think your commented point was fixed, Please type the /lgtm command.
#5079 (review)
That mark means you think this PR is ready to merge.

chlunde · 2024-02-22T14:24:36Z

@koba1t could we get another reviewer here please? Soon 1 year birthday 😄 🍰 (a lot of that time is on me)

yanniszark · 2024-03-02T02:57:56Z

/lgtm

k8s-ci-robot · 2024-03-02T02:57:59Z

@yanniszark: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

koba1t · 2024-03-06T22:13:51Z

@chlunde
Thanks, and I'm sorry for the delay in the review.
It looks like all test was passed; I think this PR is good to me!

/approve

k8s-ci-robot · 2024-03-06T22:14:09Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: chlunde, koba1t

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [koba1t]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

k8s-triage-robot · 2024-04-05T22:28:59Z

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

Reopen this PR with /reopen
Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

k8s-ci-robot · 2024-04-05T22:29:04Z

@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied

After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied

After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

Reopen this PR with /reopen

Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten

Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

koba1t · 2024-04-06T16:31:37Z

/reopen

k8s-ci-robot · 2024-04-06T16:31:41Z

@koba1t: Reopened this PR.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

koba1t · 2024-04-06T17:11:19Z

/lgtm

koba1t · 2024-04-06T17:16:24Z

Sorry. Maybe I missed merging the last time.

chlunde · 2024-04-12T07:32:27Z

@koba1t thanks! 👍

k8s-ci-robot requested review from annasong20 and natasha41575 March 7, 2023 22:00

k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Mar 7, 2023

k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Mar 7, 2023

k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 7, 2023

chlunde mentioned this pull request Mar 8, 2023

Performance improvements for kustomize build #5084

Open

1 task

k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Mar 8, 2023

koba1t reviewed Mar 8, 2023

View reviewed changes

api/internal/builtins/SortOrderTransformer.go Show resolved Hide resolved

k8s-ci-robot assigned koba1t Mar 8, 2023

k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 8, 2023

yanniszark suggested changes Mar 12, 2023

View reviewed changes

api/internal/builtins/SortOrderTransformer.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

api/internal/builtins/SortOrderTransformer.go Show resolved Hide resolved

k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 20, 2023

k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jul 20, 2023

natasha41575 reviewed Aug 21, 2023

View reviewed changes

api/internal/builtins/SortOrderTransformer.go Show resolved Hide resolved

chlunde force-pushed the perf-1 branch from a615856 to 13db38a Compare October 30, 2023 21:26

k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 30, 2023

k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 30, 2023

chlunde requested review from yanniszark, koba1t and natasha41575 October 30, 2023 21:34

k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 6, 2024

k8s-ci-robot closed this Apr 5, 2024

k8s-ci-robot reopened this Apr 6, 2024

k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 6, 2024

k8s-ci-robot merged commit 82ee768 into kubernetes-sigs:master Apr 6, 2024
15 checks passed

chlunde deleted the perf-1 branch April 12, 2024 07:32

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

perf: improve applyOrdering by avoid call to GetByCurrentId #5079

perf: improve applyOrdering by avoid call to GetByCurrentId #5079

chlunde commented Mar 7, 2023

k8s-ci-robot commented Mar 7, 2023

k8s-ci-robot commented Mar 7, 2023

koba1t commented Mar 8, 2023

koba1t commented Mar 8, 2023

natasha41575 commented Mar 10, 2023

yanniszark left a comment

koba1t commented Mar 22, 2023

k8s-triage-robot commented Jun 20, 2023

k8s-triage-robot commented Jul 20, 2023

chlunde commented Oct 30, 2023

chlunde commented Nov 13, 2023

chlunde commented Nov 22, 2023

koba1t commented Nov 22, 2023

chlunde commented Jan 8, 2024

chlunde commented Jan 19, 2024

yanniszark commented Feb 6, 2024

koba1t commented Feb 6, 2024

chlunde commented Feb 22, 2024 •

edited

Loading

yanniszark commented Mar 2, 2024

k8s-ci-robot commented Mar 2, 2024

koba1t commented Mar 6, 2024

k8s-ci-robot commented Mar 6, 2024

k8s-triage-robot commented Apr 5, 2024

k8s-ci-robot commented Apr 5, 2024

koba1t commented Apr 6, 2024

k8s-ci-robot commented Apr 6, 2024

koba1t commented Apr 6, 2024

koba1t commented Apr 6, 2024

chlunde commented Apr 12, 2024

perf: improve applyOrdering by avoid call to GetByCurrentId #5079

perf: improve applyOrdering by avoid call to GetByCurrentId #5079

Conversation

chlunde commented Mar 7, 2023

k8s-ci-robot commented Mar 7, 2023

k8s-ci-robot commented Mar 7, 2023

koba1t commented Mar 8, 2023

koba1t commented Mar 8, 2023

natasha41575 commented Mar 10, 2023

yanniszark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

koba1t commented Mar 22, 2023

k8s-triage-robot commented Jun 20, 2023

k8s-triage-robot commented Jul 20, 2023

chlunde commented Oct 30, 2023

chlunde commented Nov 13, 2023

chlunde commented Nov 22, 2023

koba1t commented Nov 22, 2023

chlunde commented Jan 8, 2024

chlunde commented Jan 19, 2024

yanniszark commented Feb 6, 2024

koba1t commented Feb 6, 2024

chlunde commented Feb 22, 2024 • edited Loading

yanniszark commented Mar 2, 2024

k8s-ci-robot commented Mar 2, 2024

koba1t commented Mar 6, 2024

k8s-ci-robot commented Mar 6, 2024

k8s-triage-robot commented Apr 5, 2024

k8s-ci-robot commented Apr 5, 2024

koba1t commented Apr 6, 2024

k8s-ci-robot commented Apr 6, 2024

koba1t commented Apr 6, 2024

koba1t commented Apr 6, 2024

chlunde commented Apr 12, 2024

chlunde commented Feb 22, 2024 •

edited

Loading