Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added tests for federatedresourcequota controller #5535

Conversation

anujagrawal699
Copy link
Contributor

Description:
This PR introduces comprehensive unit tests for the Federated Resource Quota controller and for parts which are not much complex to test.

Additions:

  1. Federated Resource Quota Sync Controller (pkg/controllers/federatedresourcequota/federated_resource_quota_sync_controller_test.go)
  2. Federated Resource Quota Status Controller (pkg/controllers/federatedresourcequota/federated_resource_quota_status_controller_test.go)

Test Coverage Improvements:

  1. federated_resource_quota_sync_controller_test.go : 0% to 55.2%
  2. federated_resource_quota_status_controller_test.go: 0% to 48.4%
    Federated Resource Quota Controller Coverage: 0% to 51.3%

What type of PR is this?
/kind failing-test
/kind feature

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes a part of #5470

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@karmada-bot karmada-bot added kind/failing-test Categorizes issue or PR as related to a consistently or frequently failing test. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. labels Sep 12, 2024
@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 12, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 12, 2024

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 34.03%. Comparing base (4dfff39) to head (6bbbf9d).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5535      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   33.86%   34.03%   +0.16%     
==========================================
  Files         643      643              
  Lines       44509    44509              
==========================================
+ Hits        15072    15147      +75     
+ Misses      28288    28208      -80     
- Partials     1149     1154       +5     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 34.03% <ø> (+0.16%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Comment on lines 109 to 114
if tt.expectedError {
assert.Error(t, err)
} else {
assert.NoError(t, err)
}
assert.Equal(t, tt.expectedResult, result)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The only judgment is meaningless. Can more logical judgments be added?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @XiShanYongYe-Chang , Thanks for the review. Actually the reconciliation logic and setting up manager are too complex to test and need extensive mocking.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If so, the test function can be removed first because it is a cost to maintenance and it has not yet produced test value.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, that will be a good step. Thanks!

Signed-off-by: Anuj Agrawal <[email protected]>

Added tests for federatedresourcequota controller

Signed-off-by: Anuj Agrawal <[email protected]>
@anujagrawal699 anujagrawal699 force-pushed the addedTests-controllers/federatedresourcequota branch from eed5cb2 to 6bbbf9d Compare September 13, 2024 04:29
@anujagrawal699
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@karmada-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@anujagrawal699: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@anujagrawal699
Copy link
Contributor Author

@XiShanYongYe-Chang Retest please.

@XiShanYongYe-Chang
Copy link
Member

/retest

Copy link
Member

@XiShanYongYe-Chang XiShanYongYe-Chang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks
/lgtm
/approve

@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 13, 2024
@karmada-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: XiShanYongYe-Chang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 13, 2024
@karmada-bot karmada-bot merged commit bf83dfe into karmada-io:master Sep 13, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/failing-test Categorizes issue or PR as related to a consistently or frequently failing test. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants