update

book/chapters/shivarthu/Shivarthu.html

@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ <h3 id="incentive-system-adaptation"><a class="header" href="#incentive-system-a
 <h3 id="does-the-schelling-game-force-you-to-vote-based-on-majority-opinion-in-other-words-cant-you-vote-according-to-your-independent-thoughts"><a class="header" href="#does-the-schelling-game-force-you-to-vote-based-on-majority-opinion-in-other-words-cant-you-vote-according-to-your-independent-thoughts">Does the Schelling game force you to vote based on majority opinion? In other words, can't you vote according to your independent thoughts?</a></h3>
 <p>First, money is not deducted from your stake; it's deducted from the incentives you're supposed to receive if you make many wrong choices. So, it’s fine to deviate from majority thinking. We can also have a platform for advocacy and discussion before the voting takes place, where you can present your arguments.</p>
 <p>You don't know how the majority will vote during the commit period, you will know only during the reveal period. Putting some disincentives for going against the wisdom of the crowd is a good way to build pressure to vote truthfully.</p>
-<p>Who will be the jurors, or who will participate in the crowd, is further filtered out and has a higher weightage through a positive externality reputation system. As education is a positive externality, educated people will have more weightage for answering.</p>
+<p>Who will be the jurors, or who will participate in the crowd, is further filtered out and has a different weightage through a positive externality reputation system. As education is a positive externality, educated people will have more weightage for answering.</p>
 <p>Furthermore, it's experimental. One must review the decisions made in a real setting and adjust based on feedback from participants. If good decisions can be made without financial penalties, that approach can also be considered.</p>
 <h2 id="where-schelling-game-implemented-in-the-project"><a class="header" href="#where-schelling-game-implemented-in-the-project">Where Schelling Game implemented in the project?</a></h2>
 <p>In this project, the Schelling game is employed to perform Know Your Customer (KYC) checks on users. Furthermore, a modified version of the Schelling game called the score Schelling game is applied to funding departments, incorporating both funding allocation and rating of users based on the positive externality they generate.</p>

book/print.html

@@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ <h3 id="incentive-system-adaptation"><a class="header" href="#incentive-system-a
 <h3 id="does-the-schelling-game-force-you-to-vote-based-on-majority-opinion-in-other-words-cant-you-vote-according-to-your-independent-thoughts"><a class="header" href="#does-the-schelling-game-force-you-to-vote-based-on-majority-opinion-in-other-words-cant-you-vote-according-to-your-independent-thoughts">Does the Schelling game force you to vote based on majority opinion? In other words, can't you vote according to your independent thoughts?</a></h3>
 <p>First, money is not deducted from your stake; it's deducted from the incentives you're supposed to receive if you make many wrong choices. So, it’s fine to deviate from majority thinking. We can also have a platform for advocacy and discussion before the voting takes place, where you can present your arguments.</p>
 <p>You don't know how the majority will vote during the commit period, you will know only during the reveal period. Putting some disincentives for going against the wisdom of the crowd is a good way to build pressure to vote truthfully.</p>
-<p>Who will be the jurors, or who will participate in the crowd, is further filtered out and has a higher weightage through a positive externality reputation system. As education is a positive externality, educated people will have more weightage for answering.</p>
+<p>Who will be the jurors, or who will participate in the crowd, is further filtered out and has a different weightage through a positive externality reputation system. As education is a positive externality, educated people will have more weightage for answering.</p>
 <p>Furthermore, it's experimental. One must review the decisions made in a real setting and adjust based on feedback from participants. If good decisions can be made without financial penalties, that approach can also be considered.</p>
 <h2 id="where-schelling-game-implemented-in-the-project"><a class="header" href="#where-schelling-game-implemented-in-the-project">Where Schelling Game implemented in the project?</a></h2>
 <p>In this project, the Schelling game is employed to perform Know Your Customer (KYC) checks on users. Furthermore, a modified version of the Schelling game called the score Schelling game is applied to funding departments, incorporating both funding allocation and rating of users based on the positive externality they generate.</p>

src/chapters/shivarthu/Shivarthu.md

@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ First, money is not deducted from your stake; it's deducted from the incentives
 
 You don't know how the majority will vote during the commit period, you will know only during the reveal period. Putting some disincentives for going against the wisdom of the crowd is a good way to build pressure to vote truthfully.
 
-Who will be the jurors, or who will participate in the crowd, is further filtered out and has a higher weightage through a positive externality reputation system. As education is a positive externality, educated people will have more weightage for answering.
+Who will be the jurors, or who will participate in the crowd, is further filtered out and has a different weightage through a positive externality reputation system. As education is a positive externality, educated people will have more weightage for answering.
 
 Furthermore, it's experimental. One must review the decisions made in a real setting and adjust based on feedback from participants. If good decisions can be made without financial penalties, that approach can also be considered.