Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#8: Analyze states and invalid transitions #134

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: trunk
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

moshez
Copy link
Collaborator

@moshez moshez commented Sep 6, 2021

For now this is completely broken, but this is starting to refactor makeDigraph into a more general "transitions" stream which should power more flexible analysis tools without making it too easy to introspect machines in-code directly.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #134 (bc46e6e) into trunk (4260ebb) will decrease coverage by 27.31%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##            trunk     #134       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   91.83%   64.51%   -27.32%     
===========================================
  Files          11       11               
  Lines        1261     1285       +24     
===========================================
- Hits         1158      829      -329     
- Misses        103      456      +353     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
automat/_visualize.py 0.00% <0.00%> (-59.46%) ⬇️
automat/_discover.py 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
automat/_test/test_discover.py 26.90% <0.00%> (-73.10%) ⬇️
automat/_test/test_visualize.py 37.31% <0.00%> (-29.86%) ⬇️
automat/_methodical.py 98.88% <0.00%> (-1.12%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4260ebb...bc46e6e. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants