Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: migration to Alloy #3

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Oct 4, 2023
Merged

feat: migration to Alloy #3

merged 12 commits into from
Oct 4, 2023

Conversation

Evalir
Copy link
Member

@Evalir Evalir commented Oct 4, 2023

No description provided.

@Evalir Evalir marked this pull request as ready for review October 4, 2023 06:34
@Evalir Evalir changed the title [WIP] feat: migration to Alloy feat: migration to Alloy Oct 4, 2023
Copy link
Member

@mattsse mattsse left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cool, this was simple,

pending q re solidity test data

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what's with these tests?

Copy link
Member Author

@Evalir Evalir Oct 4, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Noticed alloy_json_abi::JsonAbi doesn't parse pre-0.5.x ABIs and we had these tests expecting this to be the case from ethabi. This shouldn't be an issue for foundry as ds-test is >=0.5.0 though, and we should prob just remove them00.

Copy link
Member

@gakonst gakonst left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let's cut the commented out tests and add a note about that in the readme -- lgtm

@gakonst gakonst merged commit 7b63c75 into main Oct 4, 2023
14 checks passed
@gakonst gakonst deleted the evalir/alloy-migration branch October 4, 2023 22:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants