Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump aklite and composectl #1505

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 4, 2024
Merged

Bump aklite and composectl #1505

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 4, 2024

Conversation

mike-sul
Copy link
Contributor

@mike-sul mike-sul commented Aug 23, 2024

Bump aklite and composectl to the current dev main.
This is the current candidate for v95 that includes:

  1. the fix to composectl related to checking status of running apps in some edge cases.
  2. the fix to composectl related to checking whether app is installed if it includes images hosted in the docker hub.
  3. Moving from the custom-sota-client hosted in the aklite repo to the dedicated repo (sotactl).

@mike-sul
Copy link
Contributor Author

mike-sul commented Aug 23, 2024

This depends on #1484. @detsch Maybe, it makes sense to add the custom sota change/commit into this PR and drop the PR #1484.

@detsch
Copy link
Member

detsch commented Aug 23, 2024

@mike-sul, I agree, better move the PR #1484 changes into this one.

Reletative changes:
 - 8e72356 ps: Fix app running status checking if multiple versions are stored
 - 8f9c344 ps: Properly find services based on the same image
 - 9671712 check: Check "familiar" ref in addition to cannonical
 - 1b16abc app_store: Print meaningful error if app is missing

Signed-off-by: Mike Sul <[email protected]>
Relevant changes:
- 5d4534f9..d5660682 bootloader: add support for fioefi rollback mode
- 98116c60..b9146f3f main: Switch aklite daemon to the API usage
- 543a5cec..5ac24caa cli: Improve and extend the CLI update client

Signed-off-by: Mike Sul <[email protected]>
@mike-sul mike-sul marked this pull request as ready for review August 27, 2024 09:50
@mike-sul
Copy link
Contributor Author

This can be considered as early v95 candidate.

@ricardosalveti
Copy link
Member

@mike-sul @kprosise do we have any documentation about our current custom sota agent? If so we will need to update it as well, since repo and binary name got updated.

@mike-sul
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mike-sul @kprosise do we have any documentation about our current custom sota agent? If so we will need to update it as well, since repo and binary name got updated.

Yes. It's been already updated, see this PR foundriesio/docs#723.

Copy link
Member

@ricardosalveti ricardosalveti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ricardosalveti ricardosalveti merged commit 69e8905 into main Sep 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants