-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
docs(readme): mention the fact that kuik ignore its own namespace
- Loading branch information
1 parent
c18626f
commit 4b6aef1
Showing
1 changed file
with
9 additions
and
7 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
4b6aef1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @donch and @paullaffitte,
Is there a reason why that is the case? Would not a
kube-image-keeper.enix.io/image-caching-policy=ignore
label on kuik pods achieve the same result in a more targeted manner?4b6aef1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @sleterrier, do you have in mind any scenario / situation in which
you will be prevented to use kuik because of our current implementation ?
4b6aef1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @Nicolasgouze, we group our cluster base services within a few custom namespaces (e.g.
monitoring
,base-services
, etc...) to simplify administration. We could of course make an exception for kuik and isolate it to its own namespace, but I was mainly curious to understand the reasoning before I can sell it to my team :)