Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[refactor] PersistentLogin for readability and maintainability #5460

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop-6.x.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

line-o
Copy link
Member

@line-o line-o commented Sep 30, 2024

Description:

small refactoring of the persistentLogin module

Reference:

Type of tests:

None added

@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@

import java.security.SecureRandom;
import java.util.*;
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap;
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this fine?

@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@

import java.security.SecureRandom;
import java.util.*;
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be replaced by a list of package imports from java.util?

@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@

import java.security.SecureRandom;
import java.util.*;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please expand the *

/**
* Functions to access the persistent login module.
*/
public class PersistentLoginFunctions extends UserSwitchingBasicFunction {
private enum Fn {
Copy link
Member

@dizzzz dizzzz Sep 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could you give this a better name, as this looks too much on the FN: function namespace

Copy link
Member Author

@line-o line-o left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please have a look if these change are sound.

@@ -60,9 +61,9 @@ public static PersistentLogin getInstance() {

public final static int DEFAULT_TOKEN_LENGTH = 16;

public final static int INVALIDATION_TIMEOUT = 20000;
public final static int INVALIDATION_TIMEOUT = 1000;
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need to check if this is safe to lower the timeout to 1 second, was 20 seconds.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

code quality issue (minor)

@@ -197,13 +199,15 @@ public DurationValue getTimeToLive() {

public boolean checkAndUpdateToken(String token) {
if (this.token.equals(token)) {
timeoutCheck();
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this was moved from update method (line 217)

Copy link
Member

@dizzzz dizzzz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants