Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dsl: Fix missing sympy assumptions during rebuilding #2436

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 2, 2024

Conversation

EdCaunt
Copy link
Contributor

@EdCaunt EdCaunt commented Aug 1, 2024

SymPy assumptions currently disappear when objects inheriting from sympy.Symbol are rebuilt. This PR adds a patch and tests.

#2431 needs rebasing on this patch.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.01%. Comparing base (98453a6) to head (ac89150).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2436      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.00%   87.01%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         236      236              
  Lines       44851    44899      +48     
  Branches     8362     8363       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits        39021    39069      +48     
  Misses       5101     5101              
  Partials      729      729              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@FabioLuporini FabioLuporini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@FabioLuporini FabioLuporini merged commit cbd40c3 into master Aug 2, 2024
30 of 31 checks passed
@FabioLuporini FabioLuporini deleted the assumptions branch August 2, 2024 09:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants