-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
backport: bitcoin#23590, 23258, 23061, 23694 #6256
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…hecks fails faad05c Crash debug builds when mempool ConsensusScriptChecks fails (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Currently a bug in the function might sneak around our testing infrastructure. Fix that by turning bugs into crashes during tests. ACKs for top commit: glozow: utACK faad05c, there's something seriously wrong with the code if this returns false, good to throw in debug mode Tree-SHA512: dfea1cd9ce3f1c303f49cca1417cd5c77c6ed12849aaff7b6ab1b6060f2f0c9cf5d4689017355d11f66639bab35823f65f848e6979042fa875181509dfd5d3d7
Hello @UdjinM6 requesting review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK 376cb95
Hello @PastaPastaPasta, @knst , requesting review |
src/wallet/wallet.cpp
Outdated
@@ -1366,7 +1366,7 @@ void CWallet::updatedBlockTip() | |||
void CWallet::BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain() const { | |||
AssertLockNotHeld(cs_wallet); | |||
// Skip the queue-draining stuff if we know we're caught up with | |||
// chainActive.Tip(), otherwise put a callback in the validation interface queue and wait | |||
// chain.Tip(), otherwise put a callback in the validation interface queue and wait |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
23258: nit: missing parenthesis
chain -> chain()
doc/release-notes-23061.md
Outdated
- In previous releases, the meaning of the command line option | ||
`-persistmempool` (without a value provided) incorrectly disabled mempool | ||
persistence. `-persistmempool` is now treated like other boolean options to | ||
mean `-persistmempool=1`. Passing `-persistmempool=0`, `-persistmempool=1` | ||
and `-nopersistmempool` is unaffected. (#) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
…ctive() a0efe52 Fix outdated comments referring to ::ChainActive() (Samuel Dobson) Pull request description: After bitcoin#21866 there are a few outdated comments referring to `::ChainActive()`, which should instead refer to `ChainstateManager::ActiveChain()`. ACKs for top commit: jamesob: ACK bitcoin@a0efe52 Tree-SHA512: 80da19c105ed29ac247e6df4c8e916c3bf3f37230b63f07302114eef9c115add673e9649f0bbe237295be0c6da7b1030b5b93e14daf6768f17ce5de7cf2c9ff2
faa9c19 doc: Add 23061 release notes (MarcoFalke) faff17b Fix (inverse) meaning of -persistmempool (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Passing `-persistmempool` is currently treated as `-nopersistmempool` ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: reACK faa9c19 hebasto: ACK faa9c19, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged. Tree-SHA512: f34a89a07745dabe340eb845b2a348b79c093e9056f7a21c17e1ba2e278177c9b4cf30e8095791fd645a7f90eb34850b2eee0c869b4f6ec02bf749c73b0e52ee
…tion fa1571b doc: Add missing optional to MempoolEntryDescription (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Needed for bitcoin#23083. Can be reviewed with `--word-diff-regex=.`. ACKs for top commit: josibake: ACK bitcoin@fa1571b shaavan: ACK fa1571b Tree-SHA512: b4370003d2aeadce438778e15bd9a0d6a7fef4711acbe8471a50a9d72bbf74e1705fecbaae6f7eb367ece7c795a816c4b8b6583ed6c8f91b35621ca30fd95c18
376cb95
to
65821b9
Compare
Hello @knst , requesting review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK 65821b9
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK 65821b9
more bitcoin backports