-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 76
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release post for 1.9.0 #468
Release post for 1.9.0 #468
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for crystal-website ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
parameter instead. | ||
* `LLVM::Module#write_bitcode_with_summary_to_file`: ThinLTO is no longer | ||
supported; use `#write_bitcode_to_file` instead. | ||
* `LLVM::FunctionPassManager`: The legacy pass manager was removed in LLVM 17. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is not 100% correct to say these are deprecated, because LLVM 8-12 are not themselves deprecated, in which case only the legacy API is available (we should definitely deprecate the older LLVM versions some time though)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, conditional deprecations are a bit weird. I think it makes sense though. New code should not use these methods unless they explicitly wish to support LLVM < 13. Otherwise, (keep) using them is totally fine until the next major release.
Co-authored-by: Quinton Miller <[email protected]>
Most notable features are a GUI installer (available in the [release artifacts](https://github.com/crystal-lang/crystal/releases/tag/1.9.0)) | ||
and dynamic linking of DLLs (currently available via compiler flag | ||
`-Dpreview_dll`). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it worth mentioning this issue with respect to -Dpreview_dll
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this is necessary. The behaviour is fixed (no delay loading by default) and everything else explained in the Windows article.
No description provided.