Testpr.py #499
Testpr.py #499
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThis update introduces new GitHub Actions workflows for Alibaba Cloud and Deno, modifies the Changes
Uplevel your code reviews with CodeRabbit ProCodeRabbit ProIf you like this project, please support us by purchasing the Pro version. The Pro version has advanced context, superior noise reduction and several proprietary improvements compared to the open source version. Moreover, CodeRabbit Pro is free for open source projects. |
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Files selected (4)
- .github/workflows/alibabacloud.yml (1)
- .github/workflows/deno.yml (1)
- README.md (2)
- testpr.py (1)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- README.md
Review comments generated (4)
- Review: 3
- LGTM: 1
Tips
Chat with 
CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)
- Reply on review comments left by this bot to ask follow-up questions. A review comment is a comment on a diff or a file.
- Invite the bot into a review comment chain by tagging
@coderabbitaiin a reply.
Code suggestions
- The bot may make code suggestions, but please review them carefully before committing since the line number ranges may be misaligned.
- You can edit the comment made by the bot and manually tweak the suggestion if it is slightly off.
Pausing incremental reviews
- Add
@coderabbitai: ignoreanywhere in the PR description to pause further reviews from the bot.
| def add(x, y): | ||
| z = x + y | ||
| k = 3 | ||
| l = 'ff' | ||
| return z |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The variables k and l are defined but not used in the function add. This is unnecessary and can lead to confusion. If these variables are not needed, consider removing them.
- k = 3
- l = 'ff'| name: OpenAI Reviewer | ||
|
|
||
| permissions: | ||
| contents: read | ||
| pull-requests: write | ||
|
|
||
| on: [push] | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| concurrency: | ||
| group: | ||
| ${{ github.repository }}-${{ github.event.number || github.head_ref || | ||
| github.sha }}-${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event_name == | ||
| 'pull_request_review_comment' && 'pr_comment' || 'pr' }} | ||
| cancel-in-progress: ${{ github.event_name != 'pull_request_review_comment' }} | ||
|
|
||
| jobs: | ||
| review: | ||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| steps: | ||
| - uses: actions/checkout@v3 | ||
| with: | ||
| repository: ${{github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name}} | ||
| ref: ${{github.event.pull_request.head.ref}} | ||
| submodules: false | ||
| - uses: ./ | ||
| env: | ||
| GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GGITHUB_TOKEN }} | ||
| OPENAI_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.OPENAI_API_KEY }} | ||
| with: | ||
| debug: true | ||
| review_comment_lgtm: false | ||
| openai_heavy_model: gpt-4 | ||
| path_filters: | | ||
| !dist/** | ||
| !**/*.lock |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The workflow file seems to be well structured and follows the standard conventions for GitHub Actions. However, there's a typo in line 28 where GGITHUB_TOKEN should be GITHUB_TOKEN. This could lead to an error as the incorrect environment variable name is used.
- GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GGITHUB_TOKEN }}
+ GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}Also, it's important to note that storing sensitive keys like OPENAI_API_KEY directly in the workflow file can pose a security risk. It's recommended to use GitHub Secrets to store such sensitive information securely. But since you're already using secrets.OPENAI_API_KEY, it seems you're following best practices here.
Lastly, please ensure that the custom action (referenced by - uses: ./) exists in your repository and works as expected. If not, this could cause the workflow to fail.
| name: OpenAI Reviewer | ||
|
|
||
| permissions: | ||
| contents: read | ||
| pull-requests: write | ||
|
|
||
| on: | ||
| pull_request_target: | ||
| types: [opened, synchronize, reopened] | ||
| pull_request_review_comment: | ||
| types: [created] | ||
|
|
||
| concurrency: | ||
| group: | ||
| ${{ github.repository }}-${{ github.event.number || github.head_ref || | ||
| github.sha }}-${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event_name == | ||
| 'pull_request_review_comment' && 'pr_comment' || 'pr' }} | ||
| cancel-in-progress: ${{ github.event_name != 'pull_request_review_comment' }} | ||
|
|
||
| jobs: | ||
| review: | ||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| steps: | ||
| - uses: actions/checkout@v3 | ||
| with: | ||
| repository: ${{github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name}} | ||
| ref: ${{github.event.pull_request.head.ref}} | ||
| submodules: false | ||
| - uses: ./ | ||
| env: | ||
| GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} | ||
| OPENAI_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.OPENAI_API_KEY }} | ||
| with: | ||
| debug: true | ||
| review_comment_lgtm: false | ||
| openai_heavy_model: gpt-4 | ||
| path_filters: | | ||
| !dist/** | ||
| !**/*.lock |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The workflow file seems to be well structured and follows the standard conventions for GitHub Actions. It correctly sets up the job to run on ubuntu-latest, checks out the repository, and runs a custom action with environment variables and parameters.
However, I noticed that you are using pull_request_target as an event trigger. This event runs in the context of the base repository of the pull request, not in the forked repository. This means it has access to secrets from the base repository. If your workflow allows for arbitrary code execution (for example, by accepting a script as an input parameter), this could potentially expose your secrets to a malicious actor.
If your workflow does not need to access secrets or write access to the repository, consider changing the event to pull_request instead of pull_request_target. If you do need these permissions, make sure your workflow does not execute untrusted code and carefully review additions to this workflow.
- pull_request_target:
+ pull_request:Also, please ensure that the secret OPENAI_API_KEY is properly secured and has the minimum necessary permissions, as it's being used here in the workflow.
Lastly, the path_filters section is excluding changes in dist/** and **/*.lock files from triggering the workflow. Make sure this aligns with your project requirements.
Summary by CodeRabbit
alibabacloud.ymlanddeno.yml, to automate testing on pull request and push events.addfunction intestpr.pyto include two new variables. This change does not affect the function's primary operation of summing two numbers.