Fix doc parser #2

stefanvacareanu7 · 2024-09-17T20:24:42Z

No description provided.

codacy-production · 2024-09-18T23:41:57Z

workspaces/docs-generator/src/docsGenerator.ts

-  static isDefaultPattern (patternId: string, ruleModule: TSESLint.LooseRuleDefinition): boolean {
-    function prefixSplit (patternId: string): string {
+  static isDefaultPattern(patternId: string, ruleModule: TSESLint.LooseRuleDefinition): boolean {
+    function prefixSplit(patternId: string): string {


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Best Practice issue: Missing JSDoc comment.

The issue identified by the ESLint linter is the absence of a JSDoc comment for the prefixSplit function. JSDoc comments are important for providing documentation about the function's purpose, parameters, and return values, which can be useful for other developers who read the code.

To fix this issue, we need to add a JSDoc comment above the function definition. Here is the code suggestion to add the JSDoc comment:

/** * Splits the patternId by '/' and returns the prefix. * If no '/' is found, it returns an empty string. * * @param {string} patternId - The pattern identifier to split. * @returns {string} - The prefix of the patternId. */ function prefixSplit(patternId: string): string {

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2024-09-18T23:41:58Z

package.json

-    "npm-check-updates": "^16.14.20",
-    "prettier": "^3.3.2",
+    "npm-check-updates": "^17.1.2",
+    "prettier": "^3.3.3",


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Security issue: Package dependencies with variant versions may lead to dependency hijack and confusion attacks.

The issue identified by the Semgrep linter is that the version specification for the prettier package uses a caret (^) to allow for variant versions. This means that any version from 3.3.3 up to, but not including, 4.0.0 could be installed. Allowing such a range of versions can potentially introduce security vulnerabilities or breaking changes from newer versions that you haven't explicitly tested. This can lead to dependency hijack and confusion attacks where an attacker might publish a malicious version within that range.

To mitigate this, you should lock the dependency to an exact version. This ensures that only the specified version is installed, reducing the risk of inadvertently introducing vulnerabilities or breaking changes.

Here's the code suggestion to fix the issue:

Suggested change

"prettier": "^3.3.3",

"prettier": "3.3.3",

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2024-09-18T23:41:58Z

workspaces/codacy/src/configCreator.ts

@@ -45,17 +45,22 @@
  return files
 }

-async function generateEslintOptions (
+async function generateEslintOptions(


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Best Practice issue: Missing JSDoc comment.

The issue identified by the ESLint linter is the lack of a JSDoc comment for the generateEslintOptions function. JSDoc comments are important as they provide documentation for the function, including details about its parameters and return type, which can be useful for other developers who read the code.

To fix this issue, we need to add a JSDoc comment above the function declaration. Here’s a single line change suggestion to add a basic JSDoc comment:

/** * Generates ESLint options based on the provided source directory path and Codacy configuration. * * @param {string} srcDirPath - The path to the source directory. * @param {Codacyrc} codacyrc - The Codacy configuration object. * @returns {Promise<TSESLint.FlatESLint.ESLintOptions>} The generated ESLint options. */ async function generateEslintOptions(

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2024-09-18T23:41:59Z

workspaces/codacy/src/configCreator.ts

+
+//TODO: Check supported Configuration File
+// https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/configure/configuration-files
+function existsEslintConfigInRepoRoot(srcDirPath: string): string | undefined {


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Best Practice issue: Missing JSDoc comment.

The issue identified by ESLint is that the existsEslintConfigInRepoRoot function is missing a JSDoc comment. JSDoc comments are important as they provide a way to document the purpose, parameters, and return values of functions, making the code more understandable and maintainable.

To fix this issue, you should add a JSDoc comment above the function definition. Here is the single line change that adds the JSDoc comment:

/** * Checks if an ESLint configuration file exists in the repository root directory. * * @param {string} srcDirPath - The path to the source directory. * @returns {string | undefined} The name of the ESLint configuration file if it exists, otherwise undefined. */

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2024-09-18T23:42:00Z

workspaces/docs-generator/docs/multiple-tests/all-patterns/src/package.json

+    "version": "1.0.0",
+    "author": "Your Name <[email protected]>",
+    "dependencies": {
+        "typescript-eslint": "^8.5.0"


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Security issue: Package dependencies with variant versions may lead to dependency hijack and confusion attacks.

The issue identified by the Semgrep linter is related to the use of a version range (^8.5.0) for the typescript-eslint package. This versioning scheme allows for any minor or patch updates to be included automatically when running npm install or yarn install. While this can be convenient for keeping dependencies up-to-date, it also opens up the potential for dependency hijacking or confusion attacks. These attacks occur when a malicious actor publishes a compromised version of a dependency that falls within the specified range, potentially introducing vulnerabilities or malicious code into your project.

To mitigate this risk, it is recommended to use an exact version number for your dependencies. This ensures that only the specific version you have audited and tested will be installed.

Here is the suggested code change to fix the issue:

Suggested change

"typescript-eslint": "^8.5.0"

"typescript-eslint": "8.5.0"

By specifying the exact version 8.5.0, you eliminate the risk of inadvertently installing a compromised version of the dependency.

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2024-09-18T23:42:01Z

package.json

-    "typescript-eslint": "^8.0.0-alpha.39"
+    "tsx": "^4.19.1",
+    "typescript": "^5.6.2",
+    "typescript-eslint": "^8.6.0"


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Security issue: Package dependencies with variant versions may lead to dependency hijack and confusion attacks.

The issue highlighted by Semgrep points out that using a caret (^) in version specifications for package dependencies allows for the installation of any minor or patch version that is greater than the specified version but less than the next major version. This can lead to dependency hijacking or confusion attacks, where a malicious version of the package could be published and automatically used in your project.

To mitigate this risk, you should lock the dependency to a specific version or use a more restrictive version range. This way, you ensure that only the specified version (or a very narrow range of versions) is used, reducing the risk of inadvertently installing a compromised version.

Here is the code suggestion to fix the issue by specifying the exact version of typescript-eslint:

Suggested change

"typescript-eslint": "^8.6.0"

"typescript-eslint": "8.6.0"

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2024-09-18T23:42:02Z

package.json

    "tsconfig-paths": "^4.2.0",
-    "tslib": "^2.6.3"
+    "tslib": "^2.7.0"


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Security issue: Package dependencies with variant versions may lead to dependency hijack and confusion attacks.

The issue identified by the Semgrep linter is related to the use of a variant version specifier (^2.7.0) for the tslib package. Using variant version specifiers like ^ (caret) allows the installation of any version that is compatible with the specified version according to semantic versioning rules. This can lead to dependency hijacking or confusion attacks if a malicious version is published that meets the specified version range.

To mitigate this risk, you should pin the dependency to an exact version. This ensures that the exact version specified will be used, reducing the risk of inadvertently introducing a malicious or incompatible version.

Here's the code suggestion to fix the issue by pinning the tslib package to version 2.7.0:

Suggested change

"tslib": "^2.7.0"

"tslib": "2.7.0"

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2024-09-18T23:42:03Z

workspaces/codacy/src/configCreator.ts

@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@
 import { baseConfig } from "codacy/src/defaultOptions.ts";
 import { getAll, getAllRules, getRuleMeta } from "lib/models/plugins.ts";
 import { DEBUG, debug } from "lib/utils/logging.ts";
-import { patternIdToEslint } from "lib/models/patterns.ts";
+import { patternIdToEslint, securityPlugins } from "lib/models/patterns.ts";


❌ Codacy found a critical Error Prone issue: Can't resolve 'lib/models/patterns.ts' in '/src/workspaces/codacy/src'

The issue reported by ESLint indicates that the module lib/models/patterns.ts cannot be resolved from the specified path in the import statement. This usually means that the file path is incorrect or the file does not exist at the specified location.

To fix this issue, you should verify the correct relative path to the patterns.ts file. Assuming the correct path based on typical project structures, you might need to adjust the import path.

Here's the code suggestion to fix the issue:

Suggested change

import { patternIdToEslint, securityPlugins } from "lib/models/patterns.ts";

import { patternIdToEslint, securityPlugins } from "../lib/models/patterns.ts";

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2024-09-18T23:42:04Z

workspaces/codacy/src/configCreator.ts

    const patternsSet = "recommended";
+    debug(`config: retrieveCodacyPatterns`)


❌ Codacy found a critical Error Prone issue: Add a JIRA ticket number to the TODO comment (e.g. MP-123)

The issue identified by the ESLint linter is related to the TODO comment in the code. ESLint is suggesting that the TODO comment should include a JIRA ticket number to make it easier to track the task. This is a common practice in many development teams to ensure that all TODOs are accounted for and linked to specific tasks or issues in the project management system.

The specific TODO comment in the code is:

Suggested change

debug(`config: retrieveCodacyPatterns`)

//TODO: move this logic to a generic (or specific) plugin function

To fix this issue, you can add a JIRA ticket number to the TODO comment. Assuming the JIRA ticket number is "MP-123", the updated comment would look like this:

Suggested change

debug(`config: retrieveCodacyPatterns`)

//TODO: MP-123 move this logic to a generic (or specific) plugin function

Here is the code suggestion in the required format:

Suggested change

debug(`config: retrieveCodacyPatterns`)

//TODO: MP-123 move this logic to a generic (or specific) plugin function

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2024-09-18T23:42:05Z

workspaces/codacy/src/index.ts

@@ -2,4 +2,8 @@

 import { engineImpl } from "codacy/src/engineImpl.ts"

+import {  debug } from "lib/utils/logging.ts";


❌ Codacy found a critical Error Prone issue: Can't resolve 'lib/utils/logging.ts' in '/src/workspaces/codacy/src'

The issue reported by ESLint is that the module lib/utils/logging.ts cannot be resolved, meaning that the file path is incorrect or the file does not exist at the specified location. This could be due to a typo in the path, the file being in a different directory, or the file not existing at all.

To fix this issue, you need to ensure that the import path is correct. Assuming the correct path should be relative to the current file's directory, you might need to adjust the import statement accordingly. For example, if the logging.ts file is actually located in a subdirectory of the current directory, you should modify the import path to reflect that.

Here's the code suggestion to fix the issue:

Suggested change

import { debug } from "lib/utils/logging.ts";

import { debug } from "./lib/utils/logging.ts";

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2024-09-18T23:42:06Z

workspaces/codacy/src/configCreator.ts

  srcDirPath: string,
  codacyrc: Codacyrc
 ): Promise<TSESLint.FlatESLint.ESLintOptions> {
  debug("options: creating");

  let patterns = codacyrc.tools?.[0].patterns || [];
  debug(`options: ${patterns.length} patterns in codacyrc`);
+  if (DEBUG) {
+    for (let i = 0; i < patterns.length; i++) {
+      debug(`- ${JSON.stringify(patterns[i])}`)


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Error Prone issue: JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys.

The issue identified by the Semgrep linter is that JSON.stringify does not guarantee a stable key ordering for objects. This means that the order of keys in the resulting JSON string might not be consistent across different executions, which can lead to unpredictable behavior, especially if the output is being used for debugging or logging purposes.

To ensure a stable key ordering, you can use a custom function that sorts the keys of the object before converting it to a JSON string. Here's a single line change to fix the issue:

Suggested change

debug(`- ${JSON.stringify(patterns[i])}`)

debug(`- ${JSON.stringify(patterns[i], Object.keys(patterns[i]).sort())}`)

This change ensures that the keys of the object are sorted in a consistent order before being stringified.

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2024-09-18T23:42:06Z

workspaces/codacy/src/configCreator.ts

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
  return [options, files]
 }

-function generateFilesToAnalyze (
+function generateFilesToAnalyze(


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Best Practice issue: Missing JSDoc comment.

The issue identified by the ESLint linter is that the function generateFilesToAnalyze is missing a JSDoc comment. JSDoc comments are used to document the purpose of the function, its parameters, and its return type, which helps improve code readability and maintainability.

To fix this issue, you should add a JSDoc comment above the function definition. Here is a single line change to address the issue:

Suggested change

function generateFilesToAnalyze(

/** Generates a list of files to analyze based on the provided Codacy configuration. */

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2024-09-18T23:42:07Z

workspaces/codacy/src/configCreator.ts


-export async function createEslintConfig (
+export async function createEslintConfig(


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Best Practice issue: Missing JSDoc comment.

The issue reported by ESLint is that the function createEslintConfig is missing a JSDoc comment. JSDoc comments are used to describe the purpose and usage of functions, providing useful information for developers who read the code later. This is considered a best practice because it helps with code maintainability and readability.

To fix this issue, you should add a JSDoc comment above the function declaration. Here is a single line change suggestion to add a basic JSDoc comment:

/** * Creates an ESLint configuration based on the provided source directory path and Codacy configuration. * @param {string} srcDirPath - The path to the source directory. * @param {Codacyrc} codacyrc - The Codacy configuration object. * @returns {Promise<[TSESLint.FlatESLint.ESLintOptions, string[]]>} A promise that resolves to an array containing the ESLint options and files to analyze. */

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2024-09-18T23:42:08Z

package.json

+    "@types/jest": "^29.5.13",
+    "@types/lodash": "^4.17.7",
+    "@types/node": "^22.5.5",
+    "eslint": "^9.10.0",


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Security issue: Package dependencies with variant versions may lead to dependency hijack and confusion attacks.

The issue described by the Semgrep linter is related to the use of a caret (^) in the version specification for the eslint package. The caret allows the package manager to install any minor or patch version that is greater than or equal to the specified version, but less than the next major version. This can lead to dependency hijack and confusion attacks if a malicious version is published that satisfies the version range specified.

To mitigate this issue, you should lock the dependency to a specific version rather than using a range. This ensures that the exact version specified will be used, reducing the risk of inadvertently installing a malicious or incompatible version.

Here's the code suggestion to fix the issue:

Suggested change

"eslint": "^9.10.0",

"eslint": "9.10.0",

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2024-09-18T23:42:09Z

workspaces/codacy/src/configCreator.ts

@@ -183,16 +192,19 @@
  return fromPairs(pairs)
 }

-function existsEslintConfigInRepoRoot (srcDirPath: string): string | undefined {
+


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Security issue: Found existsSync from package "node:fs" with non literal argument at index 0

The security issue identified by ESLint is that the existsSync function from the node:fs package is being called with a non-literal argument. This can potentially lead to security vulnerabilities such as path traversal attacks, where an attacker might manipulate the input to access unauthorized file paths.

To fix this issue, you should ensure that the argument passed to existsSync is sanitized or validated to prevent malicious input. One simple way to address this is to use path.resolve to create an absolute path from the given srcDirPath and the filename, ensuring that the path is normalized.

Here is the code suggestion to fix the issue:

Suggested change

return filenames.find(filename => existsSync(path.resolve(srcDirPath, filename)))

This change ensures that the path is resolved to an absolute path, which mitigates the risk of path traversal attacks.

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

hjrocha and others added 14 commits September 11, 2024 11:12

first parser fix

3c8cf03

Correct comment

81ddace

partial fix of doc generator

ec99b55

Remove unsupported plugin by ESLint 9

95db6f2

Fix doc generator

d718077

fix parser and schema flatenner

432c105

Update supported config file names

2e30a87

Fix docs + remove rxjs for test purposes

5b4e05e

fix doc generator

719d4e4

fix tests

d2d7bab

fix tests part 2

c0a19e4

fix tests part 3

fc910a0

fix tests part 4

67664c1

fix tests part 5

f781b3b

stefanvacareanu7 enabled auto-merge (squash) September 18, 2024 08:21

update docs

7ce9d27

stefanvacareanu7 disabled auto-merge September 18, 2024 12:11

stefanvacareanu7 and others added 3 commits September 18, 2024 14:22

fix config

e7717c6

update docs

8cf04ad

changes to configCreator and engineImpl

303630c

codacy-production bot reviewed Sep 18, 2024

View reviewed changes

hjrocha added 2 commits September 19, 2024 10:00

fix converResults and configCreator

b8e25b7

fix all-patterns-typescript test

858c5bd

hjrocha force-pushed the fix-doc-parser branch from 9e8ad7e to 858c5bd Compare September 19, 2024 10:55

stefanvacareanu7 added 3 commits September 19, 2024 13:53

all patterns test

da96374

update tests

8010d66

add more tests

1434e29

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Fix doc parser #2

Fix doc parser #2

stefanvacareanu7 commented Sep 17, 2024

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

	import { patternIdToEslint, securityPlugins } from "lib/models/patterns.ts";
	import { patternIdToEslint, securityPlugins } from "../lib/models/patterns.ts";

		const patternsSet = "recommended";
		debug(`config: retrieveCodacyPatterns`)

	debug(`config: retrieveCodacyPatterns`)
	//TODO: move this logic to a generic (or specific) plugin function

	debug(`config: retrieveCodacyPatterns`)
	//TODO: MP-123 move this logic to a generic (or specific) plugin function

		@@ -2,4 +2,8 @@

		import { engineImpl } from "codacy/src/engineImpl.ts"

		import { debug } from "lib/utils/logging.ts";

	import { debug } from "lib/utils/logging.ts";
	import { debug } from "./lib/utils/logging.ts";

	debug(`- ${JSON.stringify(patterns[i])}`)
	debug(`- ${JSON.stringify(patterns[i], Object.keys(patterns[i]).sort())}`)

	function generateFilesToAnalyze(
	/** Generates a list of files to analyze based on the provided Codacy configuration. */


		export async function createEslintConfig (
		export async function createEslintConfig(


	return filenames.find(filename => existsSync(path.resolve(srcDirPath, filename)))

Fix doc parser #2

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Fix doc parser #2

Conversation

stefanvacareanu7 commented Sep 17, 2024

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codacy-production bot Sep 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment