Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clearly define dual templates (fsaverage, fsaverageSym, and fsLR) #1927

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Clearly define dual templates (fsaverage, fsaverageSym, and fsLR) #1927

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tsalo
Copy link
Member

@tsalo tsalo commented Sep 20, 2024

Closes #1901.

Changes proposed:

  • Make it clear that the so-called "dual templates" are only referred to that way by convention. For example, you could very easily combine the fsLR surface template with a volumetric template other than MNI152NLin6Asym.

@tsalo tsalo added derivatives schema Issues related to the YAML schema representation of the specification. Patch version release. MRI For things that affect all MRI datatypes labels Sep 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@erdalkaraca erdalkaraca Awaiting requested review from erdalkaraca erdalkaraca is a code owner

At least 2 approving reviews are required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
derivatives MRI For things that affect all MRI datatypes schema Issues related to the YAML schema representation of the specification. Patch version release.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] fsLR template description is (probably) inaccurate
1 participant
@tsalo