Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove SKIP_VALIDATION from datasets the deno validator can handle #448

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 7, 2024

Conversation

effigies
Copy link
Contributor

@effigies effigies commented Jun 7, 2024

As of bids-standard/bids-validator#1987, these should no longer raise errors.

@effigies effigies requested a review from yarikoptic June 7, 2024 20:11
@yarikoptic
Copy link
Contributor

Wow -- it is green, great!

Would it still be feasible to request some kind of an option/switch to cause them to become ERRORs so we could detect/fix them up, such as

in then examples? (I don't know if it would be feasible to aim to fix all the WARNINGs since didn't check how many we do have ATM)

@effigies
Copy link
Contributor Author

effigies commented Jun 7, 2024

Yes, I think we need a CLI or config option to override the severity level of issues. If that's not already an issue on the validator, we should add it.

@effigies effigies merged commit 4f93568 into master Jun 7, 2024
19 checks passed
@effigies effigies deleted the validate-more-examples branch June 7, 2024 20:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants