This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 1, 2023. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Avalanche treasury migration #304
Avalanche treasury migration #304
Changes from 28 commits
fade576
2c43785
e94d879
6cd686b
ac4da81
f01df05
a75ce74
e5c458e
eecd3c3
504bdc4
1c31a57
e281ecb
ff1c91f
39a4d49
fc82b37
feab379
5aad319
e6729eb
7c512e6
ef7e0af
96d2ec7
6613e13
1498b4b
6329d33
6c3ee04
b6b1c17
caa4598
dcc75f6
a40cd21
2b2880a
3f8b195
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just curious but why declare this outside the for statement?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
re-using the same variable on both for statements
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, no issue, but I've never really seen this before. If you declare it in the for statement it's still scoped in the for so you don't really need to declare a new one, don't think this would save much gas anyway.