Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

V3 canary #133

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Feb 12, 2024
Merged

V3 canary #133

merged 19 commits into from
Feb 12, 2024

Conversation

franzns
Copy link
Collaborator

@franzns franzns commented Feb 9, 2024

  • use b-sdk entities for SOR
  • change gnosis prod rpc
  • eseth apr source
  • no sanity for featured pools
  • sveth apr source
  • fix pool token dynamic data
  • fix SOR route share
  • replace dynamic data tables with jsonb column
  • add chain param to token price queries
  • change sakura rpcs

franzns and others added 19 commits February 1, 2024 15:05
create dynamic data on update if missing
* properly account for shares

* add effective SP
* removing pool type based tables

* reading from pool data column instead of a table

* fix getGyroPools chains query param

* removing quick fix GyroData table inserts

* fix: fx data defaults

* migrate type specific dynamic data to json column

* pools.type_data column

* column naming fix
* svEth APR

* svEth apr units fix

* harcoding rpc url for sveth APR
@franzns franzns marked this pull request as ready for review February 12, 2024 12:02
Comment on lines +98 to +99
} else if (!chains) {
throw new Error('poolGetGyroPools error: Provide "chains" param');
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

don't we want to make chain optional? adding type parameter to the pools query might save us some complexity as well.

@franzns franzns merged commit 6510337 into v3-main Feb 12, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants