Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: blog post on graph tools #17

Open
wants to merge 19 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

burnout87
Copy link

No description provided.

@leafty
Copy link
Member

leafty commented Jan 26, 2024

Hi @burnout87, thank you for your contribution. I will have to push some commits, as the new page is not building currently.

@volodymyrss
Copy link

Meanwhile, we'll need to also further review the content on our side.

Copy link
Member

@rokroskar rokroskar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @burnout87 and @volodymyrss for this contribution! I have a general comment - the post, as it currently stands, is not so much about workflow development as it is about viewing provenance and capturing astronomy-specific provenance. If I think of tools that help with workflow development, I imagine something that allows me to structure a workflow (e.g. via a gui) or to run a workflow in a more efficient way. So for me, the idea of using these tools for workflow development is not so clear - I think if you want to make that point, then the wording needs a bit more work.

@rokroskar
Copy link
Member

btw, I added the two of you to the authors list - feel free to update the info :)

@volodymyrss
Copy link

Thanks @burnout87 and @volodymyrss for this contribution! I have a general comment - the post, as it currently stands, is not so much about workflow development as it is about viewing provenance and capturing astronomy-specific provenance. If I think of tools that help with workflow development, I imagine something that allows me to structure a workflow (e.g. via a gui) or to run a workflow in a more efficient way. So for me, the idea of using these tools for workflow development is not so clear - I think if you want to make that point, then the wording needs a bit more work.

Yes, we'll work on this, thanks for the feedback!

@rokroskar
Copy link
Member

I could not get the images to show up with the html tags; I had to use markdown. Are you able to build it, and have the images show with the html?

@burnout87
Copy link
Author

I could not get the images to show up with the html tags; I had to use markdown. Are you able to build it, and have the images show with the html?

Thanks @rokroskar for the comment. As for the images, I didn't try since until now I was just looking at the preview on my IDE as I was writing. But I will try.

@burnout87
Copy link
Author

I could not get the images to show up with the html tags; I had to use markdown. Are you able to build it, and have the images show with the html?

I managed, I had to import the image as an asset an use it in the HTML

Question: do you instead know how to include videos? The way I normally use in markdown is not really working with mdx. We have a couple of small video demos would be nice to show

@rokroskar
Copy link
Member

I noticed that, I'm not really sure - @leafty maybe you have done this before?

@rokroskar rokroskar changed the title blog post feat: blog post on graph tools Feb 7, 2024
@rokroskar
Copy link
Member

@burnout87 @volodymyrss I've enabled videos with ReactPlayer - there might be a better way, but this works

@burnout87
Copy link
Author

@burnout87 @volodymyrss I've enabled videos with ReactPlayer - there might be a better way, but this works

Thanks, it works for me too

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants