Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ENH: Do not require prefixes to be into additional dict #45

Merged

Conversation

jcfr
Copy link
Contributor

@jcfr jcfr commented Jul 11, 2023

Do not require prefixes to be specified in the additional dictionary and perform camel case splitting after removing the prefix

Since a given prefix may not have been added to the dictionary, this commit adds an explicit check to verify that the remaining of the word is valid after stripping the prefix.

Do not require prefixes to be specified in the additional
dictionary and perform camel case splitting after removing
the prefix

Since a given prefix may not have been added to the dictionary,
this commit adds an explicit check to verify that the remaining
of the word is valid after stripping the prefix.
@jcfr jcfr mentioned this pull request Jul 11, 2023
@dave3d dave3d merged commit 2a0ed3e into SimpleITK:main Jul 11, 2023
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants