improved GCS parameter readablity

[Claudio-Chies]

The Description for the MPC_POS_MODE Parameters was not clear, as only 0,3, 4 are used, but in the dropdown this was not obvious.
now is clearer what, what is.

[dagar]

I don't think we should be exposing the value of the enums at all. I propose we instead remove the numbering in the long description.

[Claudio-Chies]

I don't think we should be exposing the value of the enums at all. I propose we instead remove the numbering in the long description.

The problem there is that the parameter is referenced by the numbers in the docs, so if we move away from the numbers, its even less clear what does what.
another idea would be to remove the numbering in the description, but leave them in the dropdown, especially since numbers are skipped (0,3,4)

[dagar]

I don't think we should be exposing the value of the enums at all. I propose we instead remove the numbering in the long description.

The problem there is that the parameter is referenced by the numbers in the docs, so if we move away from the numbers, its even less clear what does what. another idea would be to remove the numbering in the description, but leave them in the dropdown, especially since numbers are skipped (0,3,4)

Isn't that just more of the same problem? We should only be using the descriptive names everywhere right?

[Claudio-Chies]

See PX4/PX4-user_guide#3287
Adapted Feedback and updated Userguide

changes implemented