Fix import

[bendichter]

Motivation

fix #493

[bendichter]

@CodyCBakerPhD , do we have a test for the actual CLI calls that might catch this sort of thing?

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.21%. Comparing base (383e880) to head (a1c2e5f).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/nwbinspector/_inspection_cli.py	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #494      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.99%   82.21%   +0.21%     
==========================================
  Files          47       47              
  Lines        1366     1366              
==========================================
+ Hits         1120     1123       +3     
+ Misses        246      243       -3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	82.21% <66.66%> (+0.21%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/nwbinspector/_inspection_cli.py	81.35% <66.66%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

[CodyCBakerPhD]

Dang, we were reliant on the testing suite to test exactly this kind of issue but somehow over all these years there never was a --config dandi test

Added in #495, which should fail on main as proof that it could catch something like this, and will pass once this is through

Refactoring the tests is on the list of things to do over the next month, so we'll be sure to take another look from top to bottom for any more holes like this