Add StateDB IAVL consistency tests #39
Conversation
drklee3
force-pushed
the
dl-statedb-apphash-testing
branch
from
0626c2c
to
78aefce
Compare
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
missing cosmos store changes still
| for k := range s { | ||
| keys[i] = k | ||
| i++ | ||
| } |
Check failure
Code scanning / gosec
the value in the range statement should be _ unless copying a map: want: for key := range m Error
| for k := range j.dirties { | ||
| keys[i] = k | ||
| i++ | ||
| } |
Check failure
Code scanning / gosec
the value in the range statement should be _ unless copying a map: want: for key := range m Error
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // set account number | ||
| ethAcct.SetAccountNumber(accountNumberStart + uint64(i)) |
Check failure
Code scanning / gosec
Potential integer overflow by integer type conversion Error
| if acct.GetAccountNumber() != accountNumberStart+uint64(i) { | ||
| return fmt.Errorf( | ||
| "account number mismatch: expected %d, got %d", | ||
| accountNumberStart+uint64(i), acct.GetAccountNumber(), |
Check failure
Code scanning / gosec
Potential integer overflow by integer type conversion Error
|
|
||
| // Ensure there are no number gaps | ||
| for i, acct := range accounts { | ||
| if acct.GetAccountNumber() != accountNumberStart+uint64(i) { |
Check failure
Code scanning / gosec
Potential integer overflow by integer type conversion Error
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // set account number | ||
| ethAcct.SetAccountNumber(accountNumberStart + uint64(i)) |
Check warning
Code scanning / gosec
Errors unhandled. Warning
|
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days-before-close if no further activity occurs. |
SetState()that should not modify IAVL node versions