Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Towards integration on manifolds #628

Merged
merged 29 commits into from
Aug 30, 2023
Merged

Towards integration on manifolds #628

merged 29 commits into from
Aug 30, 2023

Conversation

mateuszbaran
Copy link
Member

I've started some work on integration on manifolds, mostly with exponential-wrapped distributions and kernel density estimation in mind. It is primarily inspired by http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.01983 . @sethaxen I think the volume_density function may be interesting for you 🙂 . It connects integration on a manifold with integration in normal coordinates.

@mateuszbaran mateuszbaran added enhancement New feature or request WIP Work in Progress (for a pull request) preview docs Add this label if you want to see a PR-preview of the documentation labels Jun 14, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 14, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #628 (ca69aa1) into master (7afc7af) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master     #628    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   99.20%   99.21%            
========================================
  Files         106      106            
  Lines       10215    10340   +125     
========================================
+ Hits        10134    10259   +125     
  Misses         81       81            
Files Changed Coverage Δ
src/Manifolds.jl 86.66% <ø> (ø)
src/groups/general_unitary_groups.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/manifolds/Circle.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/manifolds/Euclidean.jl 99.54% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
src/manifolds/GeneralUnitaryMatrices.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/manifolds/Hyperbolic.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/manifolds/HyperbolicHyperboloid.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/manifolds/PositiveNumbers.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/manifolds/PowerManifold.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/manifolds/ProbabilitySimplex.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 5 more

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@mateuszbaran mateuszbaran added Ready-for-Review A label for pull requests that are feature-ready and removed WIP Work in Progress (for a pull request) labels Jul 3, 2023
@mateuszbaran mateuszbaran marked this pull request as ready for review July 3, 2023 14:05
Copy link
Member

@kellertuer kellertuer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here is a few comments.

tutorials/integration.qmd Show resolved Hide resolved
tutorials/integration.qmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tutorials/integration.qmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tutorials/integration.qmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tutorials/integration.qmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tutorials/integration.qmd Show resolved Hide resolved
tutorials/integration.qmd Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@kellertuer kellertuer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here is two more remarks.

In general this is missing 4 lines of coverage, that would be nice to check.

I do not understand the theory here completely, but noticed that already quite a while ago I checked most files as “viewed” - so I think past-me found them ok.

So besides test coverage, this is fine I think.

tutorials/integration.qmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tutorials/integration.qmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mateuszbaran mateuszbaran merged commit a0c70ac into master Aug 30, 2023
27 of 31 checks passed
@kellertuer kellertuer deleted the mbaran/volume-density branch May 4, 2024 17:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request preview docs Add this label if you want to see a PR-preview of the documentation Ready-for-Review A label for pull requests that are feature-ready
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants