Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(build): fix Outline Client build in Windows #1948

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jyyi1
Copy link
Contributor

@jyyi1 jyyi1 commented Apr 1, 2024

This PR fixes a node-gyp build error of Outline Client for Windows by upgrading it to the latest version.

And the tun2socks not found runtime error caused by the wrong path of the file.

@jyyi1 jyyi1 requested review from a team as code owners April 1, 2024 22:44
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 32%. Comparing base (a310b2f) to head (5322b38).

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #1948   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage      32%     32%           
======================================
  Files          45      45           
  Lines        2620    2620           
  Branches      340     340           
======================================
  Hits          860     860           
  Misses       1760    1760           
Flag Coverage Δ
apple 15% <ø> (ø)
ios 15% <ø> (ø)
maccatalyst 15% <ø> (?)
macos 15% <ø> (ø)
unittests 32% <ø> (ø)
www 40% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sbruens sbruens merged commit 41a9721 into master Apr 2, 2024
27 checks passed
@sbruens sbruens deleted the junyi/fix-win-build branch April 2, 2024 08:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants